Achieving a PhD degree: What examiner reports tell us about the doctoral examination process

Journal Title: International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies - Year 2022, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Achieving a PhD degree is viewed by academic institutions as a major landmark of success and achievement. It gives recognition to researchers and provides entry into academia. Considering its significance, a PhD degree is not awarded lightly and doctoral candidates undergo a rigorous examination process that involves the evaluation of a written thesis and the viva voce defence of this thesis. This study seeks to gain a better understanding of the way in which examiners go about assessing doctoral work with the aim of providing more transparent and clear guidelines for examiners. Data for the study included 50 written examiner reports for twelve doctoral candidates who submitted their thesis to the Faculty of Arts at the University of Malta, for the years 2017-2018. The findings suggest that examiners in their reports include summative comments about the quality of the work. They are impressed by work that makes a contribution to knowledge, is critical and analytical and is not marred by typographical or grammatical errors. At the same time, examiners provide extensive feedback to help students improve their work. This suggests a shift in the doctoral examination process from the traditional role of summative gate-keeping to a more formative learning experience.

Authors and Affiliations

Deborah Chetcuti,Joseph Cacciottolo,Nicholas Vella,

Keywords

Related Articles

Exploring Student Perceptions Of Their Learning Through Flexible Internships

The Covid pandemic has required a more flexible delivery of student internships, but how do international students think about what they have learned from their internship experience? This article follows a mixed-mode pr...

Interrogating Pedagogical Modalities: An In-depth Examination of the Lecture Method in Higher Education

The prevalence of the lecture method in university education prompts an inquiry into its adoption, whether driven by demonstrated effectiveness or individual instructor preferences. This study aims to elucidate critical...

Fixed Term Contracts: An exploration of employment conditions in Japanese universities

This study looks at current employment practices and terms in the field of tertiary education in Japan. The importance of this study is highlighted by the growing prominence of the “academic underclass” (Itakura, 202...

A Postcolonial Curriculum Investigation in the Course “Instrument – Acoustic Guitar” of the Federal University of Bahia

Regardless of the field, the establishment of a curriculum is intrinsically connected with discussions that incorporate struggles from broader social contexts. A scrutinizing analysis of a music course’s curriculum can d...

Analysing the Cumulative Hierarchy of the Taxonomy of Learning Objectives in Flipped Classroom

The emergence of digital learning formats influences the planning and structuring of digital teaching. Especially in times of the Corona Pandemic, when many universities remain closed, new digital learning concepts are e...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP745501
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.33422/ijhep.v3i1.98
  • Views 43
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Deborah Chetcuti, Joseph Cacciottolo, Nicholas Vella, (2022). Achieving a PhD degree: What examiner reports tell us about the doctoral examination process. International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-745501