Achieving a PhD degree: What examiner reports tell us about the doctoral examination process

Journal Title: International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies - Year 2022, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

Achieving a PhD degree is viewed by academic institutions as a major landmark of success and achievement. It gives recognition to researchers and provides entry into academia. Considering its significance, a PhD degree is not awarded lightly and doctoral candidates undergo a rigorous examination process that involves the evaluation of a written thesis and the viva voce defence of this thesis. This study seeks to gain a better understanding of the way in which examiners go about assessing doctoral work with the aim of providing more transparent and clear guidelines for examiners. Data for the study included 50 written examiner reports for twelve doctoral candidates who submitted their thesis to the Faculty of Arts at the University of Malta, for the years 2017-2018. The findings suggest that examiners in their reports include summative comments about the quality of the work. They are impressed by work that makes a contribution to knowledge, is critical and analytical and is not marred by typographical or grammatical errors. At the same time, examiners provide extensive feedback to help students improve their work. This suggests a shift in the doctoral examination process from the traditional role of summative gate-keeping to a more formative learning experience.

Authors and Affiliations

Deborah Chetcuti,Joseph Cacciottolo,Nicholas Vella,

Keywords

Related Articles

For Student’s Motivation: The Role of Coping

Motivation is what we think we can do. According to the socio-cognitive approach, self-efficacy is one of the six most essential constituents of reason. This feeling encompasses all of the individual's beliefs about thei...

A Postcolonial Curriculum Investigation in the Course “Instrument – Acoustic Guitar” of the Federal University of Bahia

Regardless of the field, the establishment of a curriculum is intrinsically connected with discussions that incorporate struggles from broader social contexts. A scrutinizing analysis of a music course’s curriculum can d...

Can Mentimeter Enhance University Student Participation in Taught Sessions?

There has been much research looking into the link between active engagement and learning in higher education students. This article presents an action research study that was conducted using a qualitative method to eval...

Gender and Other Inequalities in Secondary Education in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone: Exploring the Experiences and Outcomes of Girls in Schools

This study extends limited research on understanding gender and education in post-conflict contexts. The study goes beyond the descriptive analysis of equality in terms of numbers but rather focuses on the gendered proce...

Learning Sequence “Learning | Growing | Working”: A Helpful Approach to Facilitate the Entry into the IT Faculty

Virtual teams and digital collaborative work have become an integral part of modern university teaching. The demand for suitable methods for group formation in virtual formats has increased, not least due to Covid-19. Ev...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP745501
  • DOI https://doi.org/10.33422/ijhep.v3i1.98
  • Views 1
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Deborah Chetcuti, Joseph Cacciottolo, Nicholas Vella, (2022). Achieving a PhD degree: What examiner reports tell us about the doctoral examination process. International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-745501