Acomparative study of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine to provide prolonged postoperative analgesia

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2018, Vol 8, Issue 3

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Mixing adjuvants with hyperbaric bupivacaine for intrathecal injection is an practice since long time for reducing dose requirement of bupivacaine and prolongation of duration of action. Short acting liophilic opioid fentanyl and selective apha2 agonist dexmedetomidine is used to reduce dose requirement of bupivacaine and its adverse effects and also to prolong postoperative analgesia. The main objective of the study is to compare efficacy of intrathecal adjuvants i.e., dexmedetomidine and fentanyl with hyperbaric bupivacaine to assess postoperative analgesia and side effectsMaterials and Methods:This prospective, randomized, double blinded and placebo control study was carried out in a tertiary health care centre on 105 patients by randomly allocated into 3 groups and were assigned to receive one of the three intrathecal drugs i.e.,Group D (n=35) received mixture of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (2.5ml) with Dexmedetomidine (5mcg) intrathecally, Group F(n=35) received mixture of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (2.5ml) with (25mcg) of fentanyl intrathecally and Group B received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (2.5ml) and 0.5ml normal saline intrathecally.All the solutions were made up to volume of 3ml in a 5ml syringe.Results: The duration of analgesia was significantly longer in Group D (545±61.94) compare to Group F (437.94±43.32) and Group B (263.97±22.88). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine an adjuvant to bupivacaine (H) found to be very attractive alternative to fentanyl as it provides excellent postoperative analgesia.

Authors and Affiliations

V Mashalkar Subhash, B Ramadas, Ravi Kumar, Mohammad ShakeebYusufi Attar

Keywords

Related Articles

A comparative study of midazolam plus fentanyl versus midazolam plus propofol with respect to hemodynamic stability during regional anaesthesia

Background: Patient safety has always been a major concern for the physicians of both ancient and modern eras. Aims and Objectives: To study Midazolam plus Fentanyl versus Midazolam plus Propofol with respect to Hemodyna...

Study of intravenously administered dexmedetomidine on isoflurane requirement and perioperative haemodynamic stability in elective surgery

Background and Aims: In this study we observe the effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to general anesthesia on cardiovascular response to intubation and extubation, hemodynamic stability, requirement of Isoflurane c...

A comparative study of haemodynamic parameters using Etomidate and Ketofol as induction agents

Background: Etomidate is routinely used for intravenous induction where haemodynamic stability is essential. Ketofol, an ad-mixture of Propofol and Ketamine, which also has a stable haemodynamic profile, is recently bein...

A comparative study of combination of dexmedetomidine and midazolam versus combination of midazolam and fentanyl for modified radical mastoidectomy under monitored anaesthesia care

Background: Monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) has gained importance in anaesthesia for both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in view of providing safe sedation, controlling patient’s anxiety and pain control. MAC typ...

Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Butorphanol and Fentanyl in Various Surgeries

Background: An ideal perioperative analgesic should offer protection against the pressor response should provide intense analgesia sufficient to relieve pain of surgical incision, maintain the haemodynamic parameters and...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP453354
  • DOI 10.26611/10158310
  • Views 143
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

V Mashalkar Subhash, B Ramadas, Ravi Kumar, Mohammad ShakeebYusufi Attar (2018). Acomparative study of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine to provide prolonged postoperative analgesia. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 8(3), 180-184. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-453354