ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR INFANTS IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN JUSTICE (BASED ON THE RULING OF THE LUTSK CITY DISTRICT COURT OF VOLYN REGION DATED SEPTEMBER 20, 2018, CASE № 161/11006/18)

Journal Title: Адміністративне право і процес - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue

Abstract

The purpose of this publication is a scientific analysis of the decision of the Lutsk city district court of Volyn region of September 20, 2018 on bringing a person to administrative liability under Art. 185-3 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (manifestation of disrespect to the court). The methodological basis of the presented scientific analysis is a systematic approach, system analysis. Results. The peculiarities of the objective side of such an administrative offense as a manifestation of disrespect to the court are analyzed, emphasis was placed on the obligatory observance of the courts, when considering this category of cases, the requirements of Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The attention is focused on certain defects of the structural construction of the disposition of the first part of this article, the estimated and subjective nature of its individual elements. Separately, attention is drawn to the issue of the need for interference with the rights of individuals to self-individuality, in the aspect of modern justice. Conclusions. It is concluded that the appearance of an individual is not only clothing. Along with the freedom to choose clothes, another presentation of self-expression is the public presentation of one’s own body. Piercing, tattoos, haircuts, hair dyeing – all this is the exercise of the person’s right to manifest his identity, on the one hand, and the realization of the right to personal integrity – on the other. It is proved that the current legislation does not contain normative requirements regarding the appearance of the visitors of the court, there are local rules of conduct in the courts, are strictly recommendatory and their violation can not be the basis for bringing persons to any kind of legal responsibility, including administrative under art. 185-3 Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses. The judicial practice of the US courts in the aspect of the proposed problem is analyzed, concrete examples are given. It has been stressed that contempt of the court is the concept of over-broadcaster. This is a large range of actions and actions of both process participants and listeners that prevent judges from conducting a trial or displaying a disparaging attitude to justice or justice. Disrespect for the court may be incorrect behavior of those present in the hall, offensive language regarding the court, disobedience to the court, disrespectful attitude to court remarks, rudeness, exclamations. For such behavior the judge has the right to punish, but this is, in fact, the right, not the duty of the judge.

Authors and Affiliations

Денис Вiталiйович Голобородько

Keywords

Related Articles

ON THE ISSUE OF ESSENCE AND CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT OF “PUBLIC HEALTH”

The subject matter of the study in the article is the peculiarities of the interpretation of the concept of “public health” that follows from the analysis of the materials placed in monographs, abstracts of dissertations...

The scope of legal regulation in general laws (codes) on administrative procedure

The article deals with the universal tendency to the regulation of public administration`s activities in general laws (codes) on administrative procedure. The approaches on a scope of legal regulation in such a laws (cod...

Some questions of administrative and legal status of customs bodies of Ukraine in terms of reform

The administrative-legal status of custom authorities of Ukraine including changes to current legislation in light of carrying out the administrative reform in Ukraine is investigated in the article, normative-legal ac...

SOME ASPECTS OF IMPLEMENTING THE RIGHT TO THE FREE OF CHARGE SECONDARY LEGAL AID IN THE CONTEXT OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE

The article is devoted to the analysis of certain provisions of the current legislation of Ukraine concerning the understanding and interpretation of the accessibility of justice as a key guarantee of ensuring the implem...

Legal issues of viticulture in Ukraine

In the article legal defects of viticulture legal regulation and their impact on current situation on grape production market in Ukraine have been considered. According to the Law of Ukraine «On Grapes and Grape Wine», d...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP668703
  • DOI -
  • Views 65
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Денис Вiталiйович Голобородько (2018). ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR INFANTS IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN JUSTICE (BASED ON THE RULING OF THE LUTSK CITY DISTRICT COURT OF VOLYN REGION DATED SEPTEMBER 20, 2018, CASE № 161/11006/18). Адміністративне право і процес, 4(), 45-57. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-668703