Allowing repeat winners

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2010, Vol 5, Issue 5

Abstract

Unbiased lotteries seem the least unfair and simplest procedures to allocate scarce indivisible resources to those with equal claims. But, when lotteries are repeated, it is not immediately obvious whether prior winners should be included or excluded. As in design questions surrounding single-shot lotteries, considerations of self-interest and distributive social preferences may interact. We investigate preferences for allowing participation of earlier winners in sequential lotteries. We found a strong preference for exclusion, both in settings where subjects were involved, and those where they were not. Subjects who answered questions about both settings did not differ in their tendency to prefer exclusion. Stated rationales significantly predicted choice but did not predict switching of choices between the two settings.

Authors and Affiliations

Marco D. Huesch, and Richard Brady

Keywords

Related Articles

A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment

Overprecision is the most robust type of overconfidence. We present a new method that significantly reduces this bias and offers insight into its underlying cause. In three experiments, overprecision was significantly re...

An alternative approach for eliciting willingness-to-pay: A randomized Internet trial

Open-ended methods that elicit willingness-to-pay (WTP) in terms of absolute dollars often result in high rates of questionable and highly skewed responses, insensitivity to changes in health state, and raise an ethical...

Lay intuitions about overall evaluations of experiences

Previous research has identified important determinants of overall evaluations for experiences lived across time. By means of a novel guessing task, I study what decision-makers themselves consider important. As Informan...

The value of victory: social origins of the winner’s curse in common value auctions

Auctions, normally considered as devices facilitating trade, also provide a way to probe mechanisms governing one’s valuation of some good or action. One of the most intriguing phenomena in auction behavior is the winner...

Evidence for the influence of the mere-exposure effect on voting in the Eurovision Song Contest

The mere exposure, or familiarity, effect is the tendency for people to feel more positive about stimuli to which they have previously been exposed. The Eurovision Song Contest is a two-stage event, in which some contest...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677752
  • DOI -
  • Views 105
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Marco D. Huesch, and Richard Brady (2010). Allowing repeat winners. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677752