Allowing repeat winners

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2010, Vol 5, Issue 5

Abstract

Unbiased lotteries seem the least unfair and simplest procedures to allocate scarce indivisible resources to those with equal claims. But, when lotteries are repeated, it is not immediately obvious whether prior winners should be included or excluded. As in design questions surrounding single-shot lotteries, considerations of self-interest and distributive social preferences may interact. We investigate preferences for allowing participation of earlier winners in sequential lotteries. We found a strong preference for exclusion, both in settings where subjects were involved, and those where they were not. Subjects who answered questions about both settings did not differ in their tendency to prefer exclusion. Stated rationales significantly predicted choice but did not predict switching of choices between the two settings.

Authors and Affiliations

Marco D. Huesch, and Richard Brady

Keywords

Related Articles

"Decisions from experience" = sampling error + prospect theory: Reconsidering Hertwig, Barron, Weber & Erev (2004)

According to prospect theory, people overweight low probability events and underweight high probability events. Several recent papers (notably, Hertwig, Barron, Weber & Erev, 2004) have argued that although this pattern...

High-stakes hedges are misunderstood too. A commentary on: “Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference”

Frederick, Levis, Malliaris & Meyer (2018) report a package of laboratory studies where participants underestimate the value of “hedges”: Risky bets which cancel out the risk of another presently-held bet. However, it mi...

Approximating rationality under incomplete information: Adaptive inferences for missing cue values based on cue-discrimination

In a highly uncertain world, individuals often have to make decisions in situations with incomplete information. We investigated in three experiments how partial cue information is treated in complex probabilistic infere...

"If I look at the mass I will never act": Psychic numbing and genocide

Most people are caring and will exert great effort to rescue individual victims whose needy plight comes to their attention. These same good people, however, often become numbly indifferent to the plight of individuals w...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677752
  • DOI -
  • Views 127
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Marco D. Huesch, and Richard Brady (2010). Allowing repeat winners. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677752