Allowing repeat winners

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2010, Vol 5, Issue 5

Abstract

Unbiased lotteries seem the least unfair and simplest procedures to allocate scarce indivisible resources to those with equal claims. But, when lotteries are repeated, it is not immediately obvious whether prior winners should be included or excluded. As in design questions surrounding single-shot lotteries, considerations of self-interest and distributive social preferences may interact. We investigate preferences for allowing participation of earlier winners in sequential lotteries. We found a strong preference for exclusion, both in settings where subjects were involved, and those where they were not. Subjects who answered questions about both settings did not differ in their tendency to prefer exclusion. Stated rationales significantly predicted choice but did not predict switching of choices between the two settings.

Authors and Affiliations

Marco D. Huesch, and Richard Brady

Keywords

Related Articles

Overlap of accessible information undermines the anchoring effect

According to the Selective Accessibility Model of anchoring, the comparison question in the standard anchoring paradigm activates information that is congruent with an anchor. As a consequence, this information will be m...

The tide that lifts all focal boats: Asymmetric predictions of ascent and descent in rankings

In six studies, we find evidence for an upward mobility bias, or a tendency to predict that a rise in ranking is more likely than a decline, even in domains where motivation or intention to rise play no role. Although pe...

Assessing the sensitivity of information distortion to four potential influences in studies of risky choice

The emergence of a leading alternative during the course of a decision is known to bias the evaluation of new information in a manner that favors that alternative. We report 3 studies that address the sensitivity of pred...

Decision making under hypoxia: Oxygen depletion increases risk seeking for losses but not for gains

We report a preliminary study that compared decisions made in an oxygen depleted environment with those made in a normoxic environment. Participants were presented with a series of choices that involved either losses or...

What do Americans know about inequality? It depends on how you ask them

A recent survey of inequality (Norton and Ariely, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 9–12) asked respondents to indicate what percent of the nation’s total wealth is—and should be—controlled by richer and poorer q...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677752
  • DOI -
  • Views 138
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Marco D. Huesch, and Richard Brady (2010). Allowing repeat winners. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677752