An analysis and criticism of the arguments for the individuality of the hijab
Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2015, Vol 47, Issue 101
Abstract
The hijāb is a religious obligation based on numerous sources and jurisprudential arguments. Some consider the hijāb as an individual and not a social issue, arguing that it essentially does not fall in the sphere of state interference and even other people’s intervention. The present paper discusses this important and critical issue within the responsibility domain of the Islamic state. Thus, by challenging the arguments of those who believe in the individuality of the hijāb, the paper aims to prove its sociality. The arguments are divided into two major categories: the juridical-legal and the Qur’anic, each of which find their appropriate responses in this paper. In addition, the jurisprudential aspect is studied more deeply. It should be noted, however, that the social essence of the hijāb and chastity, as well as the responsibility of the Islamic state as to protect and propagate the ideal, does not mean that the government should resort to force or judicial and penal measures for that purpose. Instead, on the basis of jurisprudential arguments, the state is obliged to adopt some of the best ways and mechanisms in order to encourage the people to exercise this good deed.
Authors and Affiliations
Mohsen Malek Afzali Ardakani, Fatemeh Fallah
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP190132
- DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v47i21.37517
- Views 115
- Downloads 0
A Different Research on the Traditions of Istiṣḥāb with the Approach to Reviving the Rule of Certitude
The rule of certitude has been brought up as one of the five pivotal principles of jurisprudence, which in itself includes several principles such as istṣḥāb (presumed continuity), but over time it has been dissociated....
A Deliberation on the Principle of Al-ta‘zīr fī kull-i ma‘ṣiya (discretionary punishment in all sins)
The relation between crime and sin is of much importance in religion-based criminal law systems. In these systems, sin against Allah have a pivotal role in realizing crimes. In the Imāmī School, the criterion for crimina...
An Exploration into the Criterion for Dividing the Jurists into Akhbārī and Uṣūlī
Dividing the jurists into akhbārī (traditionist) and uṣūlī (legal theorist) is the most important division that dichotomizes the Imāmī jurists into two groups. In jurisprudential and legal (uṣūlī) books, there are many i...
A Glance at the Impact of Invalid Conditions on a Contract
Although the corrupted condition is not protected by sanctions, there are three beliefs as to whether its corruption (fasād) permeates the contract (‘aqd) or not: theory of fasād, theory of non-permeation of fasād, theor...
Explanation of the theory of “the obligation of breastfeeding by mother and the necessity of paying its related costs by father” from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence
According to the prevailing view in the Islamic jurisprudence since breastfeeding is not mother's duty, she is entitled to demand wage from her husband for breastfeeding her child. In this article, the authors intend to...