An Analysis of the Section on Causality in Khojazada’s Tahafut
Journal Title: Nazariyat İslam Felsefe ve Bilim Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi - Year 2016, Vol 3, Issue 1
Abstract
In this article, the nineteenth section of Khojazāda’s (d. 893/1488) Tahāfut, which was devoted to the problem of causality in an example of the works under the same title written during the fifteenth century and composed with the patronage of the Ottoman sultan Mehmed II (d. 886/1481), is subjected to a critical analysis. His discussion follows a critical course with respect to al-Ghazālī (d. 505/1111) in context. This could be detected most clearly in his vindication of Avicenna (d. 428/1037) against al-Ghazālī’s accusation of the philosophers’ denial of miracles. Moreover, Khojazāda’s discussion has certain differences with al-Ghazālī’s at both the conceptual and the argumentative levels. The most striking differences at the argumentative level is Khojazāda’s grounding of his own conception of revelation and miracles on Avicennia’s, rather than al-Ghazālī’s, theory of prophethood. By the same token, he offered a practical response to the imputation that the Avicennian system leaves no room for the possibility of miracles. At the conceptual level, furthermore, he distinguished between complete and incomplete causes, in contradistinction with al-Ghazālī, and thereby opened another ground in order to demonstrate the inability of those natures that he viewed as incomplete causes to produce their own effects. On the other hand, Khojazāda concurs with al-Ghazālī that causality did not presume an ontological necessity, yet this condition did not incur defects on the certainty of our knowledge.
Authors and Affiliations
Muhammet Fatih Kılıç
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP296303
- DOI 10.12658/Nazariyat.3.1.M0033
- Views 147
- Downloads 0
Debating Sufi Knowledge in the Eighteenth-Century Ottoman Thought: An Analysis of the Saçaḳlīzāde-‘Alamī Debate on Divine Inspiration (‘ilm al-ladunn)
At the beginning of the eighteenth century, two Ottoman scholars named Saçaḳlīzāde and ‘Alamī Aḥmad Efendi wrote treatises and engaged in a scientific debate about divine inspiration (al-‘ilm al-ladunnī). Saçaḳlīzāde’s R...
Islamic Philosophy: History and Problems, M. Cüneyt Kaya
M. Cüneyt Kaya (ed.), Islamic Philosophy: History and Problems [İslâm Felsefesi: Tarih ve Problemler], İstanbul: İSAM Yayınları, 2013, 869 pages, ISBN: 978-605-4829-05-7
Pushing the Boundaries of the Universe: The Criticisms of Peripatetic Cosmology in Hikmat al-ishraq and its Commentaries
In this article, focused on the criticism of Suhrawardi who is the founder of the Ishrāqi School, four cosmological problems pointed out in the Hikmat al-Ishrāq are analyzed. These problems, which allow for the comparati...
Arithmetical Algebra in the Islamic History of Mathematics and Its Peak in the 9th/15th Century: Ibn al-Ha‘im’s al-Mumti‘
Algebra, defined as a method to determine the unknown by means of what is known, given the link between the two, took its initial steps toward disciplinary status during the third/ninth century when al-Khwārizmī produced...
The Practical Philosophy of Al-Fārābī and Avicenna: A Comparison
This article compares the approaches to practical philosophy of the two most significant Muslim philosophers of the classical period, al-Fārābī (d. 950) and Ibn Sīnā (d. 1037). Initially, I will examine their classificat...