An association of lymph node status and estrogen progesterone receptors in patients with carcinoma breast

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Surgery - Year 2018, Vol 8, Issue 3

Abstract

Background: Breast carcinoma is the 2nd most common carcinoma in woman and accounts to 22% of all female cancer, which is more than twice the prevalence of cancer in women at any other site. Aims and objective: To study the association of lymph node status and estrogen progesterone receptors in patients with carcinoma breast. Methodology: This study was carried out on patients coming to the Department of Surgery in Yenepoya Medical College Hospital from October 2013 to October 2015. Around 50 patients with breast carcinoma not treated by chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy were included. The clinical information like age of the patient, age of menarche, age of menopause, parity of the patient, tumour size, number of lymph nodes and BMI were collected. The statistical analysis was done by Fisher Exact test. Result: Maximum people were in the age group of 45-50years. The specimen from these women was sent for estrogen and progesterone receptor status analysis. The mean age of the patients in the study is 48 years. Majority of patients had positive lymph node numbers between 4-10 and they were mostly estrogen receptor negative. It was found that, as the number of lymph nodes increased the estrogen receptors were negative. The results were highly significant (p<0.001). Similar comparison was made between the number of positive lymph nodes and the progesterone receptor status. Majority of patients had positive lymph node numbers 4-10 and they were mostly progesterone receptor negative. This result was highly significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: This was a prospective study and based on the results obtained from this study it can be concluded that the estrogen and progesterone receptor status is associated with Lymph node involvement. It was found that the number of lymph nodes affected increased as the negativity of the receptor increased. Receptor positive tumour was associated with less number of lymph node.

Authors and Affiliations

Karthik R Aithal, Ryan Denis Fernandes

Keywords

Related Articles

A study of effectiveness of ceftriaxone and metronidazole versus ciprofloxacin and metronidazole for the prevention of post-surgical wound infections

Background: post-operative surgical site infections are more commonly seen worldwide. Antibiotics with different action spectrums were studied for the prevention of post-operative surgical site infections. This study com...

A Study of the factors associated with the nonhealing ulcers at tertiary health care centre

Background: An ulcer is defined as a full thickness loss of epidermis and some dermis, which heals with scarring. Aims and Objectives: To Study the factors associated with the non-healing ulcers at tertiary health care c...

Bile culture and sensitivity in post cholecystectomy specimens

Background: Without previous biliary intervention, most bile is considered sterile. However, with the presence of stones or obstruction, the likelihood of bacterial contamination increases. With nucleation of bile and ga...

Evaluation of factors leading to conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Introduction: In the modern era laparoscopic cholecystectomy is established gold standard surgery for cholecystectomy. Conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy is a step towards the safety of the patient. The...

Outcome of surgical management of blunt trauma abdomen

Background:Blunt abdominal trauma is a condition in which high index of suspicion is required along with investigations to diagnose intraperitoneal injuries. The primary goal in treatment of severe abdominal injury is to...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP471973
  • DOI 10.26611/106838
  • Views 156
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Karthik R Aithal, Ryan Denis Fernandes (2018). An association of lymph node status and estrogen progesterone receptors in patients with carcinoma breast. Medpulse International Journal of Surgery, 8(3), 89-91. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-471973