An interpretation of focal point responses as non-additive beliefs

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2014, Vol 9, Issue 4

Abstract

This paper provides a novel interpretation of focal point responses (0, 50, 100 percent) in terms of ambiguous beliefs dynamics that arise in new developments of decision theory such as Choquet expected utility theory. In particular, focal point responses that have been updated from nonfocal responses can be interpreted as non-additive beliefs that account for psychological bias. A focal point response of 100 that has been updated from a nonfocal response can be represented by a non-additive belief that has been updated according to the Overestimating Update Rule. A focal point response of zero that has been updated from a nonfocal response can be represented by a non-additive belief that has been updated according to the Underestimating Update Rule. Focal point responses given consistently over time are not subject to psychological bias, and can be represented by additive probability distributions. Estimation results show such a model to be a very good fit to the data.

Authors and Affiliations

Aylit Tina Romm

Keywords

Related Articles

New designs for research in delay discounting

The two most influential models in delay discounting research have been the exponential (E) and hyperbolic (H) models. We develop a new methodology to design binary choice questions such that exponential and hyperbolic d...

Nudge to nobesity II: Menu positions influence food orders

“Very small but cumulated decreases in food intake may be sufficient to have significant effects, even erasing obesity over a period of years” (Rozin et al., 2011). In two studies, one a lab study and the other a real-wo...

The power of touch: An examination of the effect of duration of physical contact on the valuation of objects

The duration of ownership has been shown to increase the valuation of items that people currently own as well as items they have owned in the past, a phenomenon termed the “length-of-ownership effect.” We hypothesize tha...

Downside financial risk is misunderstood

The mathematics of downside financial risk can be difficult to understand: For example a 50% loss requires a subsequent 100% gain to break-even. A given percentage loss always requires a greater percentage gain to break-...

Improved realism of confidence for an episodic memory event

We asked whether people can make their confidence judgments more realistic (accurate) by adjusting them, with the aim of improving the relationship between the level of confidence and the correctness of the answer. This...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678137
  • DOI -
  • Views 105
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Aylit Tina Romm (2014). An interpretation of focal point responses as non-additive beliefs. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678137