Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Versus 2% Lidocaine in Lower Central Incisors - A Comparative Study

Journal Title: International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: Adequate pain control is the cornerstone of any successful dental treatment. Study was done to assess the efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine in achieving anesthesia in Lower central incisors. Material and methods: This study included 24 patients with otherwise normal mandibular central incisors. Each Patient was administered local anaesthesia during two separate appointments where 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with 1:100000 epinephrine was administered in the first visit and 1.8 ml 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in the second visit in the labial sulcus adjacent to the mandibular right central incisor. The response of the test tooth was assessed using Endo Ice® and Electric Pulp Tester (EPT) for every 5 minutes for up to a maximum of 1 hour after injection or till the tooth became responsive whichever was earlier. Results: The mean onset of pulpal anesthesia for 2% Lidocaine 8.4 (S.D., 2.5 min), and 4% Articaine is 7.4 (S.D., 3.0 min), respectively. The mean duration of pulpal anesthesia on EPT for 2% Lidocaine and 4% Articaine was 10.41 (S.D, 8.58 min) and 20.6 (S.D, 12 min) respectively and the mean duration of pulpal anesthesia on Endo-Ice 2% Lidocaine and 4% Articaine was 13.75 (S.D., 8.37 min) and 29.16 (S.D., 8.03 min) respectively. Conclusion: Articaine demonstrated a higher percentage of anesthesia efficacy and duration than lidocaine. The use of 4% Articaine efficacy and duration was about 55% more effective than 2% Lidocaine and Endo Ice® was 28% more reliable than EPT.

Authors and Affiliations

Abdulaziz Saad Abu- Melha, Abdullah Hussain Altheeb, Abdulaziz Amer Alasmari

Keywords

Related Articles

HbA1C and its Correlation with Lipid Profile in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is present in as many as 30% of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes. It has been recognized for some time that diabetics experience a greater mortality during the acute pha...

Assessing Asthma Control using Asthma Control Test and Spirometry

Introduction: The goal of asthma treatment is to obtain and maintain a good control of symptoms. The focus of asthma control is now shifting to an assessment and treatment approach. This study aimed at assessing asthma c...

Profile of Echocardiographic Changes in COR Pulmonale

Introduction: Cor pulmonale occurs when the right side of the heart is affected in the setting of chronic lung disease. Cor pulmonale can range clinically from mild changes in right ventricular function to frank right he...

To Evaluate the Effectiveness of Central Venous Pressure Measurement and Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Cases of Paediatric Shock

Introduction: Central Venous Pressure (CVP) measurement is the recommended method for assessment of intravascular status in paediatric shock. The role of Ultrasonography guided measurement of respiratory collapsibility i...

Pilon Fracture; An Unsolved Riddle An Updated Review

Introduction: Pilon fractures are complex and challenging as they are difficult to treat fractures of lower extremities because these are typically intra-articular and associated with extensive soft tissue damage. Treatm...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP430738
  • DOI -
  • Views 111
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Abdulaziz Saad Abu- Melha, Abdullah Hussain Altheeb, Abdulaziz Amer Alasmari (2018). Anesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Versus 2% Lidocaine in Lower Central Incisors - A Comparative Study. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research, 5(4), 34-36. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-430738