Approaches of the European Court of Human Rights on the right to freedom of peaceful assembly

Abstract

This article is dedicated to European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) case law on freedom of peaceful assemblies. The author analyzes the circumstances in which the ECHR may admit that the state interferes with the right to peaceful assembles and whether this interference is legitimate from the prospective of European Convention. According to the ECHR case law, either act or nonfeasance of general or individual character taken before, during, or after the peaceful assembly could be considered as an interference in the right to peaceful assemble even if such actions had no apparent effect on the actual conduct of peaceful assembly, or formally legally not related to its consequences. The interference may also be recognized when the authorities take no necessary actions related to conduction of peaceful assembly in cases where such actions could be reasonably expected. In order to verify that the interference with the right to freedom of peaceful assembly meets the conditions of the Convention, the Court uses the special three-part test. The interference does not violate the Convention if it is prescribed by the law, has at least one legitimate aim, and is necessary in the democratic society. As to the first requirement, the general practice of the ECHR is used. The restriction on peaceful assembly would be considered as prescribed by the law if the law is accessible and sufficiently precise to enable the citizen to foresee the consequences of his or her behavior, whether lawful or not. It is very hard for applicant to prove that the restriction of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly does not pursue one of the legitimate aims of the Convention. The ECHR in most cases does not question the reference of the state to one of the legitimate aims under the Conventions. The only possible way for the applicant to prove that the restriction does not pursue one of the legitimate aims is to provide Court with the strong evidence that the reference given by the state is purely formal and another hidden aim exists that is not prescribed by the Convention. Interference with the freedom of peaceful assembly must also meet the criteria of necessity in a democratic society. In practice, this means, first of all, that the state should demonstrate a sufficient degree of tolerance for peaceful gatherings, proportionally balance the interests of the members of the assemblies and those who do not participate in them, and be ready to fulfill the positive responsibilities of the state during the peaceful gatherings.

Authors and Affiliations

Maxim Sereda

Keywords

Related Articles

Legal aspects of cases in courts of Ukraine on submissions on forced entering to the debtor’s dwelling

The article analyzes the court practice of courts of Ukraine regarding submissions of enforcement agents on forced entering to the debtor’s dwelling or other property. On the basis of court practice, the existence of a s...

Людство як правова і філософська категорія

У статті здійснено аналіз розвитку людства через самопізнання та поступового об’єднання в окремого суб’єкта суспільних та правових відносин. Осмислення процесів глобалізації, поглиблення взаємозалежності між державами, а...

Accessibility as a Principle of Public Authorities Functioning

The article provides a general analysis of the content and essence of the principle of accessibility as a component of the rule of law in the activities of state authorities and local self-government bodies. The author o...

European Social Standards in the Context of a Modern Model of Sources of Social Security Law: A Scientific and Theoretical Aspect

The article reveals the issues related to the legal characteristic of European social standards and their impact on the development of the latest model of sources of social security law. It is noted that the European mod...

Європейські соціальні стандарти в контексті сучасної моделі джерел права соціального забезпечення: науково-теоретичний аспект

У статті розкрито питання, пов’язані з правовою характеристикою європейських соціальних стандартів та напрямів їх впливу на розвиток новітньої моделі джерел права соціального забезпечення. Наголошено на особливостях форм...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP486170
  • DOI 10.18523/2617-2607.2018.55-62
  • Views 68
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Maxim Sereda (2018). Approaches of the European Court of Human Rights on the right to freedom of peaceful assembly. Наукові записки НаУКМА. Юридичні науки, 0(), 55-62. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-486170