Arguments for Treating CRISPR-Edited Persons as Vulnerable

Journal Title: Annals of Bioethics & Clinical Applications - Year 2022, Vol 5, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper is composed of four parts. In the first part is briefly described the origin of germline genome editing technology and its unique characteristics. The second part discusses germline genome editing is ethically unjustifiable today because of the unfavorable risk-benefit ratio. The third part argues that CRISPR-edited persons ought to be treated as a vulnerable. The fourth part is to argue that people in the present generation have moral obligations to future generations.

Authors and Affiliations

Ruipeng Lei* and Renzong Qiu

Keywords

Related Articles

The Philosopher Pamplekis (1733-1793): The First Witness of Free Thought

Christodoulos Pamplekis was born in 1733 in the village of Babini, Etoloakarnania and was the son of Efstathios. He learned the first letters in his village, probably in the Monastery of Agios Georgios, which was a great...

Sanctity of Human Life in Bioethics

Sanctity of human life plays important role in bioethics since the beginning of human life until its natural death. Sanctity of human life does not belong exclusively to religions but also to secular bioethical debate. O...

The Impact of the COVID- 19 Pandemic on the Values and Behaviors of Young People in Light of the Current Circumstances

This study aimed to identify the impact of the Covid- 19 pandemic on the values and behaviors of young people in light of the current circumstances. The study sample consisted of (70) young men and women, who were select...

Psychedelic Mushrooms: The Use of Psilocybin in the Treatment of Mental Disorders

Psychedelics are a class of hallucinogenic drugs. They have been explored particularly for treatment-resistant psychiatric illnesses. In recent years, advances in psychopharmacology have benefited thousands of patients w...

Citizen and Ethical Control of File Management in the Teaching Secretary’s Office

Cuban society is immersed in an Educational Revolution so that the people can acquire an adequate development in file management with high ethical principles and better management of the records that circulates in the Te...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP745658
  • DOI 10.23880/abca-16000241
  • Views 49
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ruipeng Lei* and Renzong Qiu (2022). Arguments for Treating CRISPR-Edited Persons as Vulnerable. Annals of Bioethics & Clinical Applications, 5(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-745658