Arguments for Treating CRISPR-Edited Persons as Vulnerable

Journal Title: Annals of Bioethics & Clinical Applications - Year 2022, Vol 5, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper is composed of four parts. In the first part is briefly described the origin of germline genome editing technology and its unique characteristics. The second part discusses germline genome editing is ethically unjustifiable today because of the unfavorable risk-benefit ratio. The third part argues that CRISPR-edited persons ought to be treated as a vulnerable. The fourth part is to argue that people in the present generation have moral obligations to future generations.

Authors and Affiliations

Ruipeng Lei* and Renzong Qiu

Keywords

Related Articles

Risk Reduction for Alzheimers Disease, Setting a Goal for All of Us: The Science and the Time are Right to Incorporate This into Public Awareness, Public Health and Healthcare Practice

Allow me to set the stage with some background for reference. Dementia is changes in the brain that result in loss of cognitive function that interferes with life. While Alzheimer’s disease is the most common, there are...

Unusual Case of Pyoderma Gangrenosum and Bilateral Ear

Levamisole has been considered an adulterant in cocaine and increasingly reported as the cause for many of the complications noted in cocaine users. The main reason for intentionally adding this compound to street cocain...

Abortion and Cultural Barbarism

This article deals with abortion and its social consequences. The relativization of the value of the person and human life is criticized. Scientific positions on the beginning of life and the lack of a legal, scientific...

Tax Advisors and Professional Secrecy in Directive 2011/16/EU of the Council of February 15, 2011

This article makes a modest and succinct exposition over the situation of tax advisers with the tax administration and their clients in the European Union, referring to professional secrecy as an essential basis of trust...

A New Bioethics for the Anthropocene

How do our conceptions of bioethics develops the world undergoes profound and rapid changes? What active efforts could be made by bioethicists in order to keep up? As the Great Acceleration propels humanity further towar...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP745658
  • DOI 10.23880/abca-16000241
  • Views 30
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ruipeng Lei* and Renzong Qiu (2022). Arguments for Treating CRISPR-Edited Persons as Vulnerable. Annals of Bioethics & Clinical Applications, 5(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-745658