ASPECTS CONCERNING THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN THE LIGHT OF THE CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Abstract

The presumption of innocence represents a constant principle of law, becoming in our modern era a basic principle of all law systems. In Romania, the presumption of innocence is regulated by the Romanian Constitution, as revised, but at the same time by the Criminal Procedure Code that came into effect on 1st February 2014. The application of this principle is closely connected with other procedural guarantees of the suspect and/or defendant during the penal trial, this presumption being expressly given efficiency by judicial bodies under the scope of majority of court orders. The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms addresses effectively the presumption of innocence in the dispositions of Art. 6 § 2, and the jurisprudence of the European Court has also established some specific criteria in its application. Our study aims to make a brief analysis of the jurisprudence of the European Human Rights Court on the presumption of innocence, with respect to a number of causes, regarding Romania but also other member states of the Council of Europe and towards national standards involved by its regulation. The applicability of the standards established by the European Court of Human Rights concerning this presumption confers to national courts from Romania the possibility to insure effectiveness to the national norm, by completing it, which ensures full compliance of all the guarantees a defendant may benefit from during criminal trials. We consider that the national norm on presumption of innocence stipulated by art 4 of Criminal Procedure code may be modified as well in the light of the agreement given by the European Court in the application of the provisions of art 6 § 2 from the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Authors and Affiliations

Rodica Aida POPA

Keywords

Related Articles

REASONS CONCERNING THE RESTRICTION OF SOME RIGHTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ART. 53 OF CONSTITUTION

An essential dimension of the lawful state is represented by the consecration and guaranteeing of the fundamental rights and liberties, the ensuring of the optimum conditions for their exercising. The state authorities h...

USE OF THE INSTRUMENTS OF SALES IMPROVEMENT IN THE NEIGHBOURHOOD STORES

The retail market in the Republic of Croatia has considerably changed during several last years by entering of large European hypermarkets and by opening a great number of shopping centres. This particularly affected th...

CONSIDERATIONS ON RE-SOCIALISATION, SOCIAL REINSERTION AND RECOVERY THROUGH EDUCATION

This paper mainly aims at pointing to the criteria that make a detainee be eligible for re-socialisation. In addition to this, we distinguish between negative re-socialization, when the expected result is not obtained, a...

LEGISLATIVE MEASURES ON THE ISSUE OF PRISON OVERCROWDING AND IMPROPER MATERIAL CONDITIONS OF DETENTION, FOLLOWING THE ECtHR PILOT-JUDGMENT REZMIVEȘ AND OTHERS AGAINST ROMANIA

This paper deals with the issue of prison overcrowding and improper material conditions of detention. The first part of the study is developed based on the national standards, followed by a presentation of the internatio...

HISTORICAL COST ACCOUNTING OR FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

The two paradigms about the accounting valuation systems are discussed: historical cost accounting and fair value accounting. The advantages and disadvantages of the historical cost accounting and fair value accounting i...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP301315
  • DOI -
  • Views 149
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Rodica Aida POPA (2018). ASPECTS CONCERNING THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE IN THE LIGHT OF THE CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 10(12), 165-169. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-301315