Assessment of Efficacy of two Different Obturating Techniques while performing Root Canal Therapy: A Comparative Study

Journal Title: Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

Background: The success of this treatment depends on many factors, and the technical quality of Root canal therapy is one of the most important.The success features of RCT, namely absence of pain, regression of AP, tight seal of canal and coronal spaces, and recovery of tooth function, must be reevaluated over time.Hence; we planned the present study to assess and compare the efficacy of two different obturating techniques in performing root canal therapy. Materials & methods: The present research included assessment and comparison of efficacy of two different obturating techniques in performing root canal therapy. A total of 50 freshly extracted mandibular premolars were obtained from the department of oral surgery and orthodontics. All the teeth specimens were randomly divided into two study groups as follows: Group A: Teeth specimens obturated with lateral condensation technique, Group A: Teeth specimens obturated with Obtura II technique.Obturation was carried out in both the study groups according to techniques. Sectioning of the root portion of the tooth specimens was done with double end diamond discs and was assessed under stereomicroscope. Frequency and area of occurrence of voids was calculated and recorded in Microsoft excel sheet. Results: Mean area of voids in the Group A specimens was 1.7525 while in mean area of voids in the group B specimens was 10842. While comparing the mean area of voids in between specimens of group A and group B, significant results were obtained. Mean number of voids among specimens of Group A and Group B was 21 percent and 12 percent respectively. While comparing the mean number of voids in between the two study groups significant results were obtained. Conclusion: Obtura II technique produced less voids and is more effective in comparison to lateral condensation technique.

Authors and Affiliations

Chandrakanth Majeti, Swathi Gumudavelli, Laxman Roy Ch

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparison of different analgesic in controlling pain in patients undergoing Orthodontic Treatment- An Original Research

Background: In orthodontic treatment, patient experience pain. The present study was conducted to compare role of acetaminophen and ketorolac in controlling pain in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Materials &...

A Comparative Study of Graft Uptake between Chin and Ramal Graft in the Reconstruction of Atrophic Anterior Maxillary Edentulous Ridges for Implant Placement

Introduction: The goal of modern dentistry is to restore the patient to normal function, esthetics, comfort, speech and health, which can be brought by caries prevention or replacing of missing teeth. Loss of teeth may b...

DISINFECTION OF EXTRACTED HUMAN TEETH: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Background: Extracted teeth are used commonly by dental students as well as researchers to improve their technical skills for future dental practice as well as to conduct various studies. Extracted teeth are a potentia...

COMPARISON OF OUTCOME OF LAPROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY IN COMPLICATED AND UNCOMPLICATED APPENDICITIS- A CLINICAL STUDY

Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common emerĀ¬gent abdominal condition requiring surgical intervention. Appendicitis is inflammation of the appendix. The present study was conducted to assess the results of lapr...

AZZOPARDI PHENOMENON

Azzopardi phenomenon is a histomorphologic phenomenon characterized by deposition of the basophilic material in the necrotic blood vessel walls associated with several malignant tumors. It was first correctly identifie...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP548840
  • DOI -
  • Views 106
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Chandrakanth Majeti, Swathi Gumudavelli, Laxman Roy Ch (2018). Assessment of Efficacy of two Different Obturating Techniques while performing Root Canal Therapy: A Comparative Study. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research, 6(8), 79-81. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-548840