Assessment of Efficacy of two Different Obturating Techniques while performing Root Canal Therapy: A Comparative Study

Journal Title: Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

Background: The success of this treatment depends on many factors, and the technical quality of Root canal therapy is one of the most important.The success features of RCT, namely absence of pain, regression of AP, tight seal of canal and coronal spaces, and recovery of tooth function, must be reevaluated over time.Hence; we planned the present study to assess and compare the efficacy of two different obturating techniques in performing root canal therapy. Materials & methods: The present research included assessment and comparison of efficacy of two different obturating techniques in performing root canal therapy. A total of 50 freshly extracted mandibular premolars were obtained from the department of oral surgery and orthodontics. All the teeth specimens were randomly divided into two study groups as follows: Group A: Teeth specimens obturated with lateral condensation technique, Group A: Teeth specimens obturated with Obtura II technique.Obturation was carried out in both the study groups according to techniques. Sectioning of the root portion of the tooth specimens was done with double end diamond discs and was assessed under stereomicroscope. Frequency and area of occurrence of voids was calculated and recorded in Microsoft excel sheet. Results: Mean area of voids in the Group A specimens was 1.7525 while in mean area of voids in the group B specimens was 10842. While comparing the mean area of voids in between specimens of group A and group B, significant results were obtained. Mean number of voids among specimens of Group A and Group B was 21 percent and 12 percent respectively. While comparing the mean number of voids in between the two study groups significant results were obtained. Conclusion: Obtura II technique produced less voids and is more effective in comparison to lateral condensation technique.

Authors and Affiliations

Chandrakanth Majeti, Swathi Gumudavelli, Laxman Roy Ch

Keywords

Related Articles

ORAL HEALTH KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS IN AL-KHARJ – SAUDI ARABIA

Purpose: This study was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice regarding oral health among the Rural Government Primary school teachers in Al-Kharj, Kingdom Saudi Arabia. Methodology: A cross-sectional...

ASSESSMENT OF EFFICACY OF MONTELUKAST AND PSEUDOEPEDRINE IN TREATING PATIENTS OF ALLERGIC RHINITIS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Background: Allergic rhinitis is the most common form of allergic disease, estimated to affect up to 20% of the population worldwide. The current study was planned to assess the efficacy of Montelukast and Pseudoepedrine...

DRUG RESISTANCE PATTERN AMONG PATIENTS WITH TUBERCULOSIS- A CLINICAL STUDY

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a contagious disease caused by the bacillus Mycobacterium (M.) tuberculosis and occasionally by Mycobacterium bovis, and Mycobacterium africanum. There are cases of drug-resistant TB thro...

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PERIODONTAL DISEASE AND HEAD AND NECK CANCER AND ESTIMATION OF C -REACTIVE PROTEIN: A CLINICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDY

Background: Moderately elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration is a systemic marker of inflammation and a documented risk factor for head and neck cancer. Unrecognized infections, such as periodontal diseas...

TRANSVERSE VAGINAL SEPTUM DIAGNOSED DURING LABOR: A CASE REPORT

Transverse vaginal septum is a rare congenital utero vaginal anomaly with a frequency of 1 in 70,000 females. This septum is a membrane of fibrous connective tissue. The patients usually have normal hymenal opening. Thes...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP548840
  • DOI -
  • Views 97
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Chandrakanth Majeti, Swathi Gumudavelli, Laxman Roy Ch (2018). Assessment of Efficacy of two Different Obturating Techniques while performing Root Canal Therapy: A Comparative Study. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research, 6(8), 79-81. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-548840