Autoethnography – Technique, Method, or New Paradigm? On Methodological Status of Autoethnography

Journal Title: PRZEGLĄD SOCJOLOGII JAKOŚCIOWEJ - Year 2014, Vol 10, Issue 3

Abstract

The goal of the paper is an introduction of conceptual order to existing categories of autoethnography research. The author tries to reconstruct dimensions in which autoethnography is used in contemporary social investigation basing on the review of studies referring to autoethnography. She distinguishes three levels on which autoethnography is applied: (1) the level of techniques of data gathering, (2) the level of investigation method or strategy, (3) the epistemological level referring to philosophy of social research in which autoethnography appears as new paradigm of social research. The reasons of great popularity of autoethnography come from metamorphosis of the humanities itself (after postmodern turn and performative turn). The author discusses reasons of necessity to appeal to approach of “participant’s perspective” in the social sciences. She specifies denotations of the term “autoethnography” with reference to history of its applications and enumerates conditions of critique referring to this kind of investigation practice. Discussing methodological status of autoethnography, the author indicates fundamental paradigmatic split between analytic and evocative autoethnography, which separate these two worlds of research practices. The first one is marked by scientistic and excessively intellectual agenda of reality description. The second one accents emotional, intimate involvement and embodied participation into the collaborative process of knowledge creation.

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Kacperczyk

Keywords

Related Articles

Intensification of Imagination: On the Researcher’s Identity and the Suspension of Unconditional Objectivity Intensification of Imagination: On the Researcher’s Identity and the Suspension of Unconditional Objectivity

Such academic values as impartiality of thinking, logical rules, tolerance in scientific matters define the spirit of science. Following the ethnographer’s path and looking at my own research, I point out that a person’s...

Anthropologists and anthropology versus the process of delineating borders of the discipline. The Polish case.

In this article, I examine the problem of the borders of anthropology and its identity as a discipline of knowledge. I focus on four themes. I take into consideration what anthropologists treat as an indicator of separat...

O działaniu w ramach konceptualnej niewidzialności. Przykład badań nad macierzyństwem jednopłciowym w doświadczeniu matek niebiologicznych

Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przyjrzenie się codziennemu życiu par jednopłciowych wspólnie wychowujących dziecko poczęte w ramach związku z perspektywy matki niebiologicznej, która w świetle prawa polskiego jest osobą...

Wizualna teoria ugruntowana. Podstawowe zasady i procedury

W artykule przedstawiam podstawowe procedury i pojęcia metodologii teorii ugruntowanej, w której używa się danych wizualnych. Metodologię tę nazywamy wizualną teorią ugruntowaną. Dane wizualne są tu używane, by konstr...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP127024
  • DOI -
  • Views 105
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Anna Kacperczyk (2014). Autoethnography – Technique, Method, or New Paradigm? On Methodological Status of Autoethnography. PRZEGLĄD SOCJOLOGII JAKOŚCIOWEJ, 10(3), 32-75. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-127024