BACKGROUND OF FORMATION OF THE THEORY OF MULTICULTURALISM: PROJECT «JUSTICE» J. RAWLS

Abstract

This article is devoted to the issues of the theoretical project of «justice» of the famous American researcher, social liberal John Rawls. The project is called «justice as fairness» because honest here interpreted very broadly: the principle applies not only to the procedure, but the results of social interaction. For John Rawls society appears as a cooperative enterprise for the sake of mutual benefit and justice — is an intelligent design, because without elected people the principles of justice can’t be social cooperation. These principles are the principle of equal freedom; the principle of fair equality of opportunity; the principle of distinction, which is the ideological foundation of multiculturalism. According to the study of theory, social inequality should be compensated, and natural — to influence the distribution of benefits. An important conclusion is John. Rawls that the basic structure of society must be transformed so that all the natural talent to work for the benefit of the less successful members of society. Particular attention is paid to the idea of «cross-consensus». The meaning of the idea of «cross consensus» is that different groups of countries, religious and cultural communities can come to an agreement on certain standards of human behavior, if they are tolerant towards differences in outlook. This is not a merger of different views and ideas in a metaideology not parallel coexistence of foreign cultures that interact weakly with each other. On the contrary, the idea of «cross-consensus» involves the search for common clashes of opinion, which complement each other and create growing space consent. On this basis, there is the possibility of creating a new code of behavior principles that will help in the future development of a stable order, finding a compromise in the different views on the benefit and ensuring social harmony and stability as important conditions for the existence of a multicultural society.

Authors and Affiliations

L. A. Liapina

Keywords

Related Articles

РOLITICAL AESTHETICS IN THE SYSTEM OF RESOURCES AND WAYS OF SOCIAL-NORMATIVE ADAPTATION OF INDIVIDUALS

This article is devoted to the studies of political aesthetics as the important resource of social-normative adaptation of individuals. The special attention is given to the aspects of using of monuments of art for legit...

RELATIONS BETWEEN THE RULING ELITE AND THE MASSES: THE ESSENCE OF THE BASIC APPROACHES AND CONCEPTS

This article discusses the basic concepts of the elites and their relations with the masses. The relations of the elite and masses form a special section of the society, a special relationship. In connection with the eme...

BRICS IN THE SYSTEM OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS XXI CENTURY

The article analyzes the creation and formation of a new international association in the BRICS format, its strategic aims and objectives. The main directions of activity are considered on economic, political and defense...

DINAMICS OF VALUES TRANSFORMATIONS OF CITIZENS OF METROPOLIS (EXAMPLE OF KHARKIV)

The article presents the results of analyze the dynamics and factors of the value changes of the inhabitants of Kharkiv. The relevance of the study of urban socio-cultural environment as a space for the development of sp...

SOCIAL-STATUS ASPIRATIONS AND CAREER EXPECTATIONS OF PRECARPATIAN REGION TEENAGE YOUTH (BASED ON THE SURVEY OF STUDENTS OF GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS)

The article is devoted to the results of the study «Value orientations of Ivano-Frankivsk’s general secondary institutions students» conducted by the Educational and Scientific Center of Sociological Research of Precarpa...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP255494
  • DOI 10.18524/2304-1439.2016.3(26).118847
  • Views 67
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

L. A. Liapina (2016). BACKGROUND OF FORMATION OF THE THEORY OF MULTICULTURALISM: PROJECT «JUSTICE» J. RAWLS. Вісник Одеського національного університету. Соціологія і політичні науки, 21(3), 41-48. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-255494