Basic postulates of the theory of religious economy in the sociology of religion

Abstract

The article defines the concept of “religious economy” and outlines its cognitive function - the basic concept of the theory of religious economy. The postulate of compensators is explained which explains the functions of religion and religious organizations. The deductive theory of religion is revealed, which explains the influence of secularization on the emergence of new religious organizations. The postulate of religious capital, which explains the processes of religious conversion and interconfessional transitions, is described. The postulate of “expensive” churches is described, which explains the high level of institutional religiosity. The postulate of religious niches is analyzed, which explains the relationship between the religious preferences of people and the diversity of religious organizations. The theory of religious economics has made a positive contribution to the sociology of religion, since it drew attention to those aspects of (predominantly American) religious life that had not been considered before, and its representatives gathered and summarized a vast amount of empirical material and continued to do so. The theoretical coordinates of the theory are directed not at refuting secularization, but on the justification of the complexity of the dynamics of religious changes and the variability of ties between religious pluralism and the viability of religion. The postulates of the “religious economy”, “religious niches,” and “expenditures” as a methodological basis for the analysis of religion introduce a new understanding of the nature of the plurality of pluralism and variation in the practices of religious actors, the role of culture and socio-structural changes, not only in the external perspective relative to the religious organization of the environment, but also internal, including the explanation of the phenomena of marginal “volumes” of religion, the sustainability of the existence of “expensive churches” in the context of increasing diversity, understanding the process of self-restraint of secularization in “deductive theory of religion”.

Authors and Affiliations

С. С. Яремчук

Keywords

Related Articles

Retrospective of the spiritual and social aspects of the springs of Greek-Catholic spirituality in the second half of the XIX century

The article deals with the socio-cultural and political-administrative situation in Galicia after joining the Austro-Hungarian monarchy. The aspects of the social activity of the clergy of the Greek Catholic Church in th...

Using of social networks by a diplomatic service of the Republic of Poland

Due to the fast development of modern information technologies, the world began to experience fundamental and dynamic changes. These changes have affected diplomatic services around the world. The Republic of Poland is t...

Socio-demographic model of electoral behavior and gender stereotypes

Gender electoral stereotypes concept is a developing paradigm are not key in electoral researches in Ukraine. However, if models are based on traditional concepts (the sociological (social background), socio-psychologica...

Gender neutrality in Swedish society

Over the last decade the importance of the gender component in society and the influence of society itself on the definition of personality became apparent. If sex is programmed naturally, the gender is constructed socia...

Vector of European politics of the US Congress at the end of XX and beginning of XXI century

In the article the features of politics of American parliament are investigated in relation to the European states. Two basic directions of the European foreign policy vector of the US Congress are distinguished: polit...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP445513
  • DOI -
  • Views 123
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

С. С. Яремчук (2016). Basic postulates of the theory of religious economy in the sociology of religion. Вісник Національного технічного університету України “Київський політехнічний інститут”. Політологія. Соціологія. Право., 3(), 109-116. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-445513