Basic postulates of the theory of religious economy in the sociology of religion

Abstract

The article defines the concept of “religious economy” and outlines its cognitive function - the basic concept of the theory of religious economy. The postulate of compensators is explained which explains the functions of religion and religious organizations. The deductive theory of religion is revealed, which explains the influence of secularization on the emergence of new religious organizations. The postulate of religious capital, which explains the processes of religious conversion and interconfessional transitions, is described. The postulate of “expensive” churches is described, which explains the high level of institutional religiosity. The postulate of religious niches is analyzed, which explains the relationship between the religious preferences of people and the diversity of religious organizations. The theory of religious economics has made a positive contribution to the sociology of religion, since it drew attention to those aspects of (predominantly American) religious life that had not been considered before, and its representatives gathered and summarized a vast amount of empirical material and continued to do so. The theoretical coordinates of the theory are directed not at refuting secularization, but on the justification of the complexity of the dynamics of religious changes and the variability of ties between religious pluralism and the viability of religion. The postulates of the “religious economy”, “religious niches,” and “expenditures” as a methodological basis for the analysis of religion introduce a new understanding of the nature of the plurality of pluralism and variation in the practices of religious actors, the role of culture and socio-structural changes, not only in the external perspective relative to the religious organization of the environment, but also internal, including the explanation of the phenomena of marginal “volumes” of religion, the sustainability of the existence of “expensive churches” in the context of increasing diversity, understanding the process of self-restraint of secularization in “deductive theory of religion”.

Authors and Affiliations

С. С. Яремчук

Keywords

Related Articles

Peculiarities of the legal relations arising in the implementation of practice of European Court of human rights in courts of Ukraine

The article investigates the peculiarities of the legal relations arising in the implementation of practice of ECHR in courts of Ukraine. The problems and causes of inadequate perception and adaptation by the Ukrainian c...

The problematic side studies of social tension of Ukrainian society

In the article was submitted an overall assessment of basic research problems of studying the social tension. There are shown, it is, as a social phenomenon and as a concept is ambiguous and complex phenomenon theoreti...

Analysis of legal regulation and organization examination of goods (samples) of goods in customs controls

The article analyzes the current status of legal support and organization of taking samples (samples) of goods during customs control. The essence and peculiarities of the corresponding procedure are characterized, in pa...

Theoretical interpretation and the modeling of the concept "group loyalty"

The article presents the main approaches to the definition of "group loyalty" in socio-human sciences. On this basis the structure, levels, factors and fields of formation of group loyalties are distinguished, and the sc...

The essence and scope of self-determination principle in mediation

Party self-determination in the mediation process is one of the five philosophies of mediation among voluntariness, confidentiality, neutrality and a unique solution, and all these principles are intrinsically linked. Th...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP445513
  • DOI -
  • Views 138
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

С. С. Яремчук (2016). Basic postulates of the theory of religious economy in the sociology of religion. Вісник Національного технічного університету України “Київський політехнічний інститут”. Політологія. Соціологія. Право., 3(), 109-116. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-445513