BCS Biowaivers: Similarities and Differences Among EMA, FDA, and WHO Requirements

Journal Title: The AAPS Journal - Year 2016, Vol 18, Issue 3

Abstract

The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), based on aqueous solubility and intestinal permeability, has enjoyed wide use since 1995 as a mechanism for waiving in vivo bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. In 2000, the US-FDA was the first regulatory agency to publish guidance for industry describing how to meet criteria for requesting a waiver of in vivo bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for highly soluble, highly permeable (BCS Class I) drugs. Subsequently, the World Health Organization (WHO) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) published guidelines recommending how to obtain BCS biowaivers for BCS Class III drugs (high solubility, low permeability), in addition to Class I drugs. In 2015, the US-FDA became better harmonized with the EMA and WHO following publication of two guidances for industry outlining criteria for obtaining BCS biowaivers for both Class I and Class III drugs. A detailed review and comparison of the BCS Class I and Class III criteria currently recommended by the US-FDA, EMA, and WHO revealed good convergence of the three agencies with respect to BCS biowaiver criteria. The comparison also suggested that, by applying the most conservative of the three jurisdictional approaches, it should be possible for a sponsor to design the same set of BCS biowaiver studies in preparing a submission for worldwide filing to satisfy US, European, and emerging market regulators. It is hoped that the availability of BCS Class I and Class III biowaivers in multiple jurisdictions will encourage more sponsors to request waivers of in vivo bioavailability/bioequivalence testing using the BCS approach.

Authors and Affiliations

Barbara M. Davit, Isadore Kanfer, Yu Chung Tsang, Jean-Michel Cardot

Keywords

Related Articles

Endocannabinoid metabolomics: A novel liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry reagent for fatty acid analysis

We have synthesized 4,4-dimethoxyoxazoline derivatives of several fatty acids associated with the endocannabinoid metabolome using tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane in a 1-step reaction by microwave irradiation. The deriva...

Biomarkers, metabonomics, and drug development: Can inborn errors of metabolism help in understanding drug toxicity?

Application of “omics” technology during drug discovery and development is rapidly evolving. This review evaluates the current status and future role of “metabonomics” as a tool in the dru...

Informatic Tools and Approaches in Postmarketing Pharmacovigilance Used by FDA

The safety profile of newly approved drugs and therapeutic biologics is less well developed by pre-marketing clinical testing than is the efficacy profile. The full safety profile of an approved product is established du...

2-Arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) membrane transport: History and outlook

Only a few studies have addressed the transport of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), a naturally occurring agonist for cannabinoid receptors. Based upon saturation kinetics, these early reports have proposed that 2-AG enter...

Pharmacokinetically-Guided Lead Optimization of Nitrofuranylamide Anti-Tuberculosis Agents

In an effort to develop novel and more potent therapies to treat tuberculosis, a new class of chemical agents, nitrofuranylamides, is being developed. The present study examines biopharmaceutic properties and preclinical...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP680870
  • DOI  10.1208/s12248-016-9877-2
  • Views 70
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Barbara M. Davit, Isadore Kanfer, Yu Chung Tsang, Jean-Michel Cardot (2016). BCS Biowaivers: Similarities and Differences Among EMA, FDA, and WHO Requirements. The AAPS Journal, 18(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-680870