BCS Biowaivers: Similarities and Differences Among EMA, FDA, and WHO Requirements

Journal Title: The AAPS Journal - Year 2016, Vol 18, Issue 3

Abstract

The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), based on aqueous solubility and intestinal permeability, has enjoyed wide use since 1995 as a mechanism for waiving in vivo bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. In 2000, the US-FDA was the first regulatory agency to publish guidance for industry describing how to meet criteria for requesting a waiver of in vivo bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for highly soluble, highly permeable (BCS Class I) drugs. Subsequently, the World Health Organization (WHO) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) published guidelines recommending how to obtain BCS biowaivers for BCS Class III drugs (high solubility, low permeability), in addition to Class I drugs. In 2015, the US-FDA became better harmonized with the EMA and WHO following publication of two guidances for industry outlining criteria for obtaining BCS biowaivers for both Class I and Class III drugs. A detailed review and comparison of the BCS Class I and Class III criteria currently recommended by the US-FDA, EMA, and WHO revealed good convergence of the three agencies with respect to BCS biowaiver criteria. The comparison also suggested that, by applying the most conservative of the three jurisdictional approaches, it should be possible for a sponsor to design the same set of BCS biowaiver studies in preparing a submission for worldwide filing to satisfy US, European, and emerging market regulators. It is hoped that the availability of BCS Class I and Class III biowaivers in multiple jurisdictions will encourage more sponsors to request waivers of in vivo bioavailability/bioequivalence testing using the BCS approach.

Authors and Affiliations

Barbara M. Davit, Isadore Kanfer, Yu Chung Tsang, Jean-Michel Cardot

Keywords

Related Articles

A Review of Clinical Translation of Inorganic Nanoparticles

Inorganic nanoparticles are widely used for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes as they offer unique features as compared with their organic and polymeric counterparts. As such, inorganic nanoparticles represent...

Delivery of Macromolecules Using Arginine-Rich Cell-Penetrating Peptides: Ways to Overcome Endosomal Entrapment

Arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptides (AR-CPPs) are very promising tools for the delivery of therapeutic macromolecules such as peptides, proteins, and nucleic acids. These peptides allow efficient internalization of t...

Targeted Delivery of Curcumin to Tumors via PEG-Derivatized FTS-Based Micellar System

The online version of this article (doi:10.1208/s12248-014-9595-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of a Monoclonal Antibody Antagonist of Glucagon Receptor in Male ob/ob Mice

Elevated basal concentrations of glucagon and reduced postprandial glucagon suppression are partly responsible for the increased hepatic glucose production seen in type 2 diabetic patients. Recently, it was demonstrated...

External Validation of the Bilirubin–Atazanavir Nomogram for Assessment of Atazanavir Plasma Exposure in HIV-1-Infected Patients

Atazanavir increases plasma bilirubin levels in a concentration-dependent manner. Due to less costly and readily available assays, bilirubin has been proposed as a marker of atazanavir exposure. In this work, a previousl...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP680870
  • DOI  10.1208/s12248-016-9877-2
  • Views 86
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Barbara M. Davit, Isadore Kanfer, Yu Chung Tsang, Jean-Michel Cardot (2016). BCS Biowaivers: Similarities and Differences Among EMA, FDA, and WHO Requirements. The AAPS Journal, 18(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-680870