Between me and we: The importance of self-profit versus social justifiability for ethical decision making
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2017, Vol 12, Issue 6
Abstract
Current theories of dishonest behavior suggest that both individual profits and the availability of justifications drive cheating. Although some evidence hints that cheating behavior is most prevalent when both self-profit and social justifications are present, the relative impact of each of these factors is insufficiently understood. This study provides a fine-grained analysis of the trade-off between self-profit versus social justifiability. In a non-student online sample, we assessed dishonest behavior in a coin-tossing task, involving six conditions which systematically varied both self-profit and social justifiability (in terms of social welfare), such that a decrease in the former was associated with the exact same increase in the latter. Results showed that self-profit outweighed social justifiability, but that there was also an effect of social justifications.
Authors and Affiliations
Sina A. Klein, Isabel Thielmann, Benjamin E. Hilbig and Ingo Zettler
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678316
- DOI -
- Views 136
- Downloads 0
Is loss-aversion magnitude-dependent? Measuring prospective affective judgments regarding gains and losses
Prospect Theory proposed that the (dis)utility of losses is always more than gains due to a phenomena called ‘loss-aversion’, a result obtained in multiple later studies over the years. However, some researchers found re...
Attachment to land: The case of the land of Israel for American and Israeli Jews and the role of contagion
This is a first study on attachment to national and sacred land and land as a protected value. A measure of attachment to the land of Israel is developed and administered to two groups, Jewish college students in Israel...
Learning to reason: The influence of instruction, prompts and scaffolding, metacognitive knowledge, and general intelligence on informal reasoning about everyday social and political issues
Twelve experiments examined ways of improving informal reasoning, as assesed by presenting students with accessible, current, and interesting social and political issues, eliciting reasoning about them, and scoring the r...
The limited value of precise tests of the recognition heuristic
The recognition heuristic models the adaptive use and dominant role of recognition knowledge in judgment under uncertainty. Of the several predictions that the heuristic makes, empirical tests have predominantly focused...
Bayesian methods for analyzing true-and-error models
Birnbaum and Quispe-Torreblanca (2018) evaluated a set of six models developed under true-and-error theory against data in which people made choices in repeated gambles. They concluded the three models based on expected...