Biases in choices about fairness: Psychology and economic inequality
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 2
Abstract
This paper investigates choices about “distributional fairness” (sometimes called “distributive justice”), i.e., selection of the proper way for resources to be distributed in group. The study finds evidence that several of the same biases of risky decision making also apply to choices about distributional fairness, in particular focusing on the key biases that lead to prospect theory. This finding is achieved by introducing a novel thought experiment regarding the fairness of resource distributions, then manipulating the percentage of individuals who gain or lose in these distributions, and changing the sizes of gains and losses. Shared biases may mean similar heuristics are being employed. The mechanism behind this result leaves room for future exploration, as do the implications of the finding for related applications in inequality research.
Authors and Affiliations
Zachary Michaelson
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678172
- DOI -
- Views 150
- Downloads 0
The average laboratory samples a population of 7,300 Amazon Mechanical Turk workers
Using capture-recapture analysis we estimate the effective size of the active Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) population that a typical laboratory can access to be about 7,300 workers. We also estimate that the time taken...
“I am uncertain” vs “It is uncertain”. How linguistic markers of the uncertainty source affect uncertainty communication
Two psychological sources of uncertainty bear implications for judgment and decision-making: external uncertainty is seen as stemming from properties of the world, whereas internal uncertainty is seen as stemming from la...
Coping strategies and immune neglect in affective forecasting: Direct evidence and key moderators
Affective forecasting skills have important implications for decision making. However, recent research suggests that immune neglect—the tendency to overlook coping strategies that reduce future distress—may lead to affec...
It’s not fair: Folk intuitions about disadvantageous and advantageous inequity aversion
People often object to inequity; they react negatively to receiving less than others (disadvantageous inequity aversion), and more than others (advantageous inequity aversion). Here we study people’s folk intuitions abou...
Solving stumpers, CRT and CRAT: Are the abilities related?
Bar-Hillel, Noah and Frederick (2018) studied a class of riddles they called stumpers, which have simple, but curiously elusive, solutions. A canonical example is: “Andy is Bobbie’s brother, but Bobbie is not Andy’s brot...