Biases in choices about fairness: Psychology and economic inequality
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 2
Abstract
This paper investigates choices about “distributional fairness” (sometimes called “distributive justice”), i.e., selection of the proper way for resources to be distributed in group. The study finds evidence that several of the same biases of risky decision making also apply to choices about distributional fairness, in particular focusing on the key biases that lead to prospect theory. This finding is achieved by introducing a novel thought experiment regarding the fairness of resource distributions, then manipulating the percentage of individuals who gain or lose in these distributions, and changing the sizes of gains and losses. Shared biases may mean similar heuristics are being employed. The mechanism behind this result leaves room for future exploration, as do the implications of the finding for related applications in inequality research.
Authors and Affiliations
Zachary Michaelson
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678172
- DOI -
- Views 181
- Downloads 0
"Head versus heart": Effect of monetary frames on expression of sympathetic magical concerns
Most American respondents give "irrational," magical responses in a variety of situations that exemplify the sympathetic magical laws of similarity and contagion. In most of these cases, respondents are aware that their...
New designs for research in delay discounting
The two most influential models in delay discounting research have been the exponential (E) and hyperbolic (H) models. We develop a new methodology to design binary choice questions such that exponential and hyperbolic d...
A new intuitionism: Meaning, memory, and development in Fuzzy-Trace Theory
Combining meaning, memory, and development, the perennially popular topic of intuition can be approached in a new way. Fuzzy-trace theory integrates these topics by distinguishing between meaning-based gist representatio...
Is saving lives your task or God’s? Religiosity, belief in god, and moral judgment
Should a Catholic hospital abort a life-threatening pregnancy or let a pregnant woman die? Should a religious employer allow his employees access to contraceptives or break with healthcare legislation? People and organiz...
The gambler’s fallacy in retrospect: A supplementary comment on Oppenheimer and Monin (2009)
Oppenheimer and Monin (2009) recently found that subjectively rare events are taken to indicate a longer preceding sequence of unobserved trials than subjectively common events, an effect which they refer to as the retro...