"Head versus heart": Effect of monetary frames on expression of sympathetic magical concerns
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 4
Abstract
Most American respondents give "irrational," magical responses in a variety of situations that exemplify the sympathetic magical laws of similarity and contagion. In most of these cases, respondents are aware that their responses (usually rejections, as of fudge crafted to look like dog feces, or a food touched by a sterilized, dead cockroach) are not "scientifically" justified, but they are willing to avow them. We interpret this, in some sense, as "heart over head." We report in this study that American adults and undergraduates are substantially less likely to acknowledge magical effects when the judgments involve money (amount willing to pay to avoid an "unpleasant" magical contact) than they are when using preference or rating measures. We conclude that in "head-heart" conflicts of this type, money tips the balance towards the former, or, in other words, that money makes the mind less magical.
Authors and Affiliations
Paul Rozin, Heidi Grant, Stephanie Weinberg and Scott Parker
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677580
- DOI -
- Views 169
- Downloads 0
Physiological arousal in processing recognition information: Ignoring or integrating cognitive cues?
The recognition heuristic (RH; Goldstein & Gigerenzer, 2002) suggests that, when applicable, probabilistic inferences are based on a noncompensatory examination of whether an object is recognized or not. The overall find...
On the complexity of traffic judges’ decisions
Professional judges in traffic courts sentence many hundreds of offenders per year. Using 639 case files from archives, we compared the Matching Heuristic (MH) to compensatory, weighing algorithms (WM). We modeled and cr...
Time preference and its relationship with age, health, and survival probability
Although theories from economics and evolutionary biology predict that one’s age, health, and survival probability should be associated with one’s subjective discount rate (SDR), few studies have empirically tested for t...
What do Americans know about inequality? It depends on how you ask them
A recent survey of inequality (Norton and Ariely, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 9–12) asked respondents to indicate what percent of the nation’s total wealth is—and should be—controlled by richer and poorer q...
New paradoxes in intertemporal choice
Similar to research on risky choice, the traditional analysis of intertemporal choice takes the view that an individual behaves so as to maximize the discounted sum of all future utilities. The well-known Allais paradox...