"Head versus heart": Effect of monetary frames on expression of sympathetic magical concerns
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 4
Abstract
Most American respondents give "irrational," magical responses in a variety of situations that exemplify the sympathetic magical laws of similarity and contagion. In most of these cases, respondents are aware that their responses (usually rejections, as of fudge crafted to look like dog feces, or a food touched by a sterilized, dead cockroach) are not "scientifically" justified, but they are willing to avow them. We interpret this, in some sense, as "heart over head." We report in this study that American adults and undergraduates are substantially less likely to acknowledge magical effects when the judgments involve money (amount willing to pay to avoid an "unpleasant" magical contact) than they are when using preference or rating measures. We conclude that in "head-heart" conflicts of this type, money tips the balance towards the former, or, in other words, that money makes the mind less magical.
Authors and Affiliations
Paul Rozin, Heidi Grant, Stephanie Weinberg and Scott Parker
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677580
- DOI -
- Views 155
- Downloads 0
It’s not fair: Folk intuitions about disadvantageous and advantageous inequity aversion
People often object to inequity; they react negatively to receiving less than others (disadvantageous inequity aversion), and more than others (advantageous inequity aversion). Here we study people’s folk intuitions abou...
Moderators of framing effects in variations of the Asian Disease problem: Time constraint, need, and disease type
This study examined framing effects in decisions concerning public health. Tversky and Kahneman’s famous Asian Disease Problem served as experimental paradigm. Subjects chose between a sure and a risky option either pres...
Pair-wise comparisons of multiple models
Often research in judgment and decision making requires comparison of multiple competing models. Researchers invoke global measures such as the rate of correct predictions or the sum of squared (or absolute) deviations o...
Proportion dominance in valuing lives: The role of deliberative thinking
Proportion responding (PR) is the preference for proportionally higher gains, such that the same absolute quantity is valued more as the reference group decreases. This research investigated this kind of proportion PR in...
The use of mixed models in a modified Iowa Gambling Task and a prisoner's dilemma game
Researchers in the decision making tradition usually analyze multiple decisions within experiments by aggregating choices across individuals and using the individual subject as the unit of analysis. This approach can mas...