[b]Refusal to Deal as an Abuse of Dominant Position[/b]

Journal Title: Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem - Year 2013, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

As a rule companies are free to decide where and when they will sell their products and with which companies or clients they are prepared to contract. Such freedom is not unlimited and a dominant company which refuses to deal may be accused of abusing its dominant position. The aim of the article is to analyse the most common forms of refusals to deal, with regard to the law on competition. The article will focus on practices which lead to the elimination of competition, discrimination against consumers and business partners and creating barriers of entry to the market. Examining such practices will answer the question as to which practices constitute a refusal to deal and abuse a dominant position. The last part of the article will focus on the issue of unbiased justification of refusal to deal. It will examine those conditions where the dominant undertaking can refuse to deal with its competitors or clients because of unbiased reasons.

Authors and Affiliations

Aleksander Maziarz

Keywords

Related Articles

Principle of specialty limiting the right in registration of an industrial design

The subject matter of the article is the principle of specialty which, in the Polish legal system, limits the scope of protection of the industrial design. In fact, the scope of protection of the industrial design in the...

Responsibility for security during the invoice wars. The case of contractors: an outline

There are many theoretical and legal issues related to the operation of PMCs and their presence (location of their registered offices) in democratic states under the rule of law that remain unsolved in legal doctrine and...

[b][i]The Principle of a Democratic Rule of Law vs. Some of the Vetting Problems[/i][/b]

In accordance with the Resolution of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, concern-ing the methods of getting rid of the legacy of the former communist totalitarian regimes, this legacy of the totalitarian...

[b]Income Taxation of Entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic[/b]

This text deals with income taxation of entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic. It concerns construction of the tax and especially the tax base and compare taxation of employees and self-employed persons. The lump sum expen...

Heredis institutio caput et fundamentum totius testamenti est – as a rule of Roman inheritance law

In the Roman inheritance law, until post-classical law, the appointment of an heir on the basis of the rule heredis institutio caput et fundamentum totius testamenti est, was the foundation of the whole will. Heredis ins...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP62449
  • DOI -
  • Views 61
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Aleksander Maziarz (2013). [b]Refusal to Deal as an Abuse of Dominant Position[/b]. Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem, 5(1), 563-585. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-62449