Bullshit for you; transcendence for me. A commentary on “On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit”
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2016, Vol 11, Issue 1
Abstract
I raise a methodological concern regarding the study performed by Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler & Fugelsang (2015), in which they used randomly generated, but syntactically correct, statements that were rated for profundity by subjects unaware of the source of the statements. The assessment of each statement’s profundity was not based on its impact on the subject but was already predetermined to be “bullshit” based on its random generation by a computer. The statements could nonetheless have been subjectively profound and could have provided glimpses of insight and wisdom to the subjects.
Authors and Affiliations
Craig Dalton
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678231
- DOI -
- Views 125
- Downloads 0
Information asymmetry in decision from description versus decision from experience
In this paper we investigate the claim that decisions from experience (in which the features of lotteries are learned through a sampling process) differ from decisions from description (in which features of lotteries are...
An assessment of the temporal dynamics of moral decisions
In the domain of moral decision making, models in which emotion and deliberation constitute competing dual-systems have become increasingly popular. Currently, the favored explanation of this interaction is what Evans (2...
How do individuals evaluate and respond to pro-equality decision makers? It depends on joint outcome and Social Value Orientation
The current studies investigated how a manipulation in joint outcome influenced individuals’ responses to pro-equality/individualistic decision makers. In Study 1 (N = 175), we examined the impact of whether equal distri...
Direct and indirect effects of pathological gambling on risk attitudes
We study individual decision making in a lottery-choice task performed by three different populations: gamblers under psychological treatment (äddicts"), gamblers' spouses ("victims"), and people who are neither gamblers...
Improved realism of confidence for an episodic memory event
We asked whether people can make their confidence judgments more realistic (accurate) by adjusting them, with the aim of improving the relationship between the level of confidence and the correctness of the answer. This...