Bullshit for you; transcendence for me. A commentary on “On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit”
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2016, Vol 11, Issue 1
Abstract
I raise a methodological concern regarding the study performed by Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler & Fugelsang (2015), in which they used randomly generated, but syntactically correct, statements that were rated for profundity by subjects unaware of the source of the statements. The assessment of each statement’s profundity was not based on its impact on the subject but was already predetermined to be “bullshit” based on its random generation by a computer. The statements could nonetheless have been subjectively profound and could have provided glimpses of insight and wisdom to the subjects.
Authors and Affiliations
Craig Dalton
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678231
- DOI -
- Views 100
- Downloads 0
Using metacognitive cues to infer others’ thinking
Three studies tested whether people use cues about the way other people think—for example, whether others respond fast vs. slow—to infer what responses other people might give to reasoning problems. People who solve reas...
Anti-social motives explain increased risk aversion for others in decisions from experience
When deciding for others based on explicitly described odds and outcomes, people often have different risk preferences for others than for themselves. In two pre-registered experiments, we examine risk preference for oth...
The boundary effect: Perceived post hoc accuracy of prediction intervals
Predictions of magnitudes (costs, durations, environmental events) are often given as uncertainty intervals (ranges). When are such forecasts judged to be correct? We report results of four experiments showing that forec...
The influence of identifiability and singularity in moral decision making
There is an increased willingness to help identified individuals rather than non-identified, and the effect of identifiability is mainly present when a single individual rather than a group is presented. However, identif...
Decision theory as an aid to private choice
A wise decider D uses the contents of his mind fully, accurately and efficiently. D’s ideal decisions, i.e., those that best serve his interests, would be embedded in a comprehensive set of totally coherent judgments lod...