Direct and indirect effects of pathological gambling on risk attitudes
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 2
Abstract
We study individual decision making in a lottery-choice task performed by three different populations: gamblers under psychological treatment (äddicts"), gamblers' spouses ("victims"), and people who are neither gamblers or gamblers' spouses ("normals"). We find that addicts are willing to take less risk than normals, but the difference is smaller as a gambler's time under treatment increases. The large majority of victims report themselves unwilling to take any risk at all. However, addicts in the first year of treatment react more than other addicts to the different values of the risk-return parameter.
Authors and Affiliations
Pablo Brañas-Garza, Nikolaos Georgantzís and Pablo Guillen
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP677575
- DOI -
- Views 162
- Downloads 0
Public policy for thee, but not for me: Varying the grammatical person of public policy justifications influences their support
Past research has shown that people consistently believe that others are more easily manipulated by external influences than they themselves are—a phenomenon called the “third-person effect” (Davison, 1983). The present...
Foreground-background salience effect in traffic risk communication
Pie charts are often used to communicate risk, such as the risk of driving. In the foreground-background salience effect (FBSE), foreground (probability of bad event) has greater salience than background (no bad event) i...
Is saving lives your task or God’s? Religiosity, belief in god, and moral judgment
Should a Catholic hospital abort a life-threatening pregnancy or let a pregnant woman die? Should a religious employer allow his employees access to contraceptives or break with healthcare legislation? People and organiz...
Predictions on the go: Prevalence of spontaneous spending predictions
The present research examines the prevalence of predictions in daily life. Specifically we examine whether spending predictions for specific purchases occur spontaneously in life outside of a laboratory setting. Across c...
Still no compelling evidence that Americans overestimate upward socio-economic mobility rates: Reply to Davidai & Gilovich (2018)
Davidai and Gilovich (2018) contend that (a) Americans tend to think about their nation’s income distribution in terms of quintiles (fifths), and (b) when Americans’ perceptions of socio-economic mobility rates are measu...