Coming close to the ideal alternative: The concordant-ranks strategy

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 3

Abstract

We present the Concordant-Ranks (CR) strategy that decision makers use to quickly find an alternative that is proximate to an ideal alternative in a multi-attribute decision space. CR implies that decision makers prefer alternatives that exhibit concordant ranks between attribute values and attribute weights. We show that, in situations where the alternatives are equal in multi-attribute utility (MAU), minimization of the weighted Euclidean distance (WED) to an ideal alternative implies the choice of a CR alternative. In two experiments, participants chose among, as well as evaluated, alternatives that were constructed to be equal in MAU. In Experiment 1, four alternatives were designed in such a way that the choice of each alternative would be consistent with one particular choice strategy, one of which was the CR strategy. In Experiment 2, participants were presented with a CR alternative and a number of arbitrary alternatives. In both experiments, participants tended to choose the CR alternative. The CR alternative was on average evaluated as more attractive than other alternatives. In addition, measures of WED, between given alternatives and the ideal alternative, by and large agreed with the preference order for choices and attractiveness evaluations of the different types of alternatives. These findings indicate that both choices and attractiveness evaluations are guided by proximity of alternatives to an ideal alternative.

Authors and Affiliations

Neda Kerimi, Henry Montgomery and Dan Zakay

Keywords

Related Articles

Are additives unnatural? Generality and mechanisms of additivity dominance

Naturalness is important and valued by most lay Western individuals. Yet, little is known about the lay meaning of “natural”. We examine the phenomenon of additivity dominance: adding something to a natural product (addi...

The irrational hungry judge effect revisited: Simulations reveal that the magnitude of the effect is overestimated

Danziger, Levav and Avnaim-Pesso (2011) analyzed legal rulings of Israeli parole boards concerning the effect of serial order in which cases are presented within ruling sessions. They found that the probability of a favo...

The default pull: An experimental demonstration of subtle default effects on preferences

The impact of default options on choice is a reliable, well-established behavioral finding. However, several different effects may lend to choosing defaults in an often indistinguishable manner, including loss aversion,...

The impact of time limitation: Insights from a queueing experiment

We experimentally explore the effects of time limitation on decision making. Under different time allowance conditions, subjects are presented with a queueing situation and asked to join one of the two given queues. The...

The impact of purchase quantity on the compromise effect: The balance heuristic

Most prior research on the compromise effect has focused on single rather than multiple choices. This research investigates the potential effects of purchase quantity on the compromise effect. We propose that the share o...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677791
  • DOI -
  • Views 148
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Neda Kerimi, Henry Montgomery and Dan Zakay (2011). Coming close to the ideal alternative: The concordant-ranks strategy. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677791