The irrational hungry judge effect revisited: Simulations reveal that the magnitude of the effect is overestimated

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2016, Vol 11, Issue 6

Abstract

Danziger, Levav and Avnaim-Pesso (2011) analyzed legal rulings of Israeli parole boards concerning the effect of serial order in which cases are presented within ruling sessions. They found that the probability of a favorable decision drops from about 65% to almost 0% from the first ruling to the last ruling within each session and that the rate of favorable rulings returns to 65% in a session following a food break. The authors argue that these findings provide support for extraneous factors influencing judicial decisions and cautiously speculate that the effect might be driven by mental depletion. A simulation shows that the observed influence of order can be alternatively explained by a statistical artifact resulting from favorable rulings taking longer than unfavorable ones. An effect of similar magnitude would be produced by a (hypothetical) rational judge who plans ahead minimally and ends a session instead of starting cases that he or she assumes will take longer directly before the break. One methodological detail further increased the magnitude of the artifact and generates it even without assuming any foresight concerning the upcoming case. Implications for this article are discussed and the increased application of simulations to identify nonobvious rational explanations is recommended.

Authors and Affiliations

Andreas Glöckner

Keywords

Related Articles

The effects of anticipated regret on risk preferences of social and problem gamblers

Anticipated regret is an important determinant in risky decision making, however only a few studies have explored its role in problem gambling. This study tested for differences in the anticipation of regret among social...

"Head versus heart": Effect of monetary frames on expression of sympathetic magical concerns

Most American respondents give "irrational," magical responses in a variety of situations that exemplify the sympathetic magical laws of similarity and contagion. In most of these cases, respondents are aware that their...

New designs for research in delay discounting

The two most influential models in delay discounting research have been the exponential (E) and hyperbolic (H) models. We develop a new methodology to design binary choice questions such that exponential and hyperbolic d...

Others’ opinions count, but not all of them: anchoring to ingroup versus outgroup members’ behavior in charitable giving

Because of the large amount of information and the difficulty in selecting an appropriate recipient in the context of charitable giving, people tend to make extensive use of heuristics, which sometimes leads them to wron...

Coherence and correspondence in engineering design: informing the conversation and connecting with judgment and decision-making research

I show how the coherence/correspondence distinction can inform the conversation about decision methods for engineering design. Some engineers argue for the application of multi-attribute utility theory while others argue...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678271
  • DOI -
  • Views 145
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Andreas Glöckner (2016). The irrational hungry judge effect revisited: Simulations reveal that the magnitude of the effect is overestimated. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(6), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678271