Others’ opinions count, but not all of them: anchoring to ingroup versus outgroup members’ behavior in charitable giving
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2013, Vol 8, Issue 6
Abstract
Because of the large amount of information and the difficulty in selecting an appropriate recipient in the context of charitable giving, people tend to make extensive use of heuristics, which sometimes leads them to wrong decisions. In the present work, we focused on exploring how individuals are influenced by anchoring heuristics and how group membership interacts with this heuristic. In Experiment 1, two different groups of participants were informed about low versus high average donations of other people, and a third control group did not receive any information about the others’ donations. The results showed that participants were willing to donate significantly more in the high-anchor condition compared to the low-anchor condition, as well as about the same amount of money in the low-anchor condition and no-anchor condition. Experiment 2 and 3 showed that high anchors are more effective when the information about others’ donations reflects members of the ingroup rather than the outgroup. Other variables related to these results are further discussed.
Authors and Affiliations
Dorina Hysenbelli, Enrico Rubaltelli and Rino Rumiati
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678101
- DOI -
- Views 120
- Downloads 0
Improving acceptability of nudges: Learning from attitudes towards opt-in and opt-out policies
Policy makers should understand people’s attitudes towards opt-out nudges to smoothly promote and implement the policies. Our research compares people’s perceptions of opt-in and three improved versions of opt-out (trans...
Recognition-based judgments and decisions: Introduction to the special issue (II)
We are pleased to present Part II of this Special Issue of Judgment and Decision Making on recognition processes in inferential decision making. In addition, it is our pleasure to announce that there will be a third part...
Is that the answer you had in mind? The effect of perspective on unethical behavior
We explored how the perspective through which individuals view their actions influences their ethicality, comparing a narrow perspective that allows for evaluation of each choice in isolation, to a broad perspective that...
Asymmetric dominance and the stability of constructed preferences
In this research, we explore how experience with an "attraction set" of options, designed to elicit an asymmetric-dominance (attraction) effect, affects choice making in a second "compromise set" designed to elicit a com...
Graphs versus numbers: How information format affects risk aversion in gambling
In lottery gambling, the common phenomenon of risk aversion shows up as preference of the option with the higher win probability, even if a riskier alternative offers a greater expected value. Because riskier choices wou...