Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 4

Abstract

Some people find it more difficult to delay rewards than others. In three experiments, we tested a “future self-continuity” hypothesis that individual differences in the perception of one’s present self as continuous with a future self would be associated with measures of saving in the laboratory and everyday life. Higher future self-continuity (assessed by a novel index) predicted reduced discounting of future rewards in a laboratory task, more matches in adjectival descriptions of present and future selves, and greater lifetime accumulation of financial assets (even after controlling for age and education). In addition to demonstrating the reliability and validity of the future self-continuity index, these findings are consistent with the notion that increased future self-continuity might promote saving for the future.

Authors and Affiliations

Hal Ersner-Hershfield, M. Tess Garton, Kacey Ballard, Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin, and Brian Knutson

Keywords

Related Articles

The impact of actively open-minded thinking on social media communication

Online, social media communication is often ambiguous, and it can encourage speed and inattentiveness. We investigated whether Actively Open Minded Thinking (AOT), a dispositional willingness to seek out new or potential...

Not all streaks are the same: Individual differences in risk preferences during runs of gains and losses

Runs of gains and losses are particularly salient to decision makers because of their perceived departure from randomness, as well as their immediate impact on the financial status of the decision makers. Past research h...

Framing effects on bidding behavior in experimental first-price sealed-bid money auctions

Consumers often face prices that are the sum of two components, for example, an online purchase that includes a stated price and shipping costs. In such cases consumer behavior may be influenced by framing, i.e., how the...

Wording effects in moral judgments

As the study of moral judgments grows, it becomes imperative to compare results across studies in order to create unified theories within the field. These efforts are potentially undermined, however, by variations in wor...

Web-conferencing as a viable method for group decision research

Studying group decision-making is challenging for multiple reasons. An important logistic difficulty is studying a sufficiently large number of groups, each with multiple participants. Assembling groups online could make...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677685
  • DOI -
  • Views 168
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hal Ersner-Hershfield, M. Tess Garton, Kacey Ballard, Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin, and Brian Knutson (2009). Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677685