The impact of actively open-minded thinking on social media communication
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2018, Vol 13, Issue 6
Abstract
Online, social media communication is often ambiguous, and it can encourage speed and inattentiveness. We investigated whether Actively Open Minded Thinking (AOT), a dispositional willingness to seek out new or potentially threatening information, may help users avoid these pitfalls. In Study 1, we determined that correctly assessing social media authors’ traits was positively predicted by raters’ AOT. In Study 2, we used data-driven methods to devise a three-dimensional picture of online behaviors of people high or low in AOT, finding that AOT is associated with thoughtful, nuanced, idiosyncratic actions and with resisting the typically fast pace of online interactions. AOT may be an important factor in accurate, socially responsible online behavior.
Authors and Affiliations
Jordan Carpenter, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, Jenna Clark, Lucie Flekova, Laura Smith, Margaret L. Kern, Anneke Buffone, Lyle Ungar and Martin Seligman
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678385
- DOI -
- Views 159
- Downloads 0
Psychometric characteristics of two forms of the Slovak version of the Indecisiveness Scale
The study investigates the psychometric characteristics of the Slovak version of the original and short form of the Indecisiveness Scale on three samples of university students and one general population sample. An explo...
Theories of truth as assessment criteria in judgment and decision making
Hammond (1996) argued that much of the research in the field of judgment and decision making (JDM) can be categorized as focused on either coherence or correspondence (C&C) and that, in order to understand the findings o...
The mean, the median, and the St. Petersburg paradox
The St. Petersburg Paradox is a famous economic and philosophical puzzle that has generated numerous conflicting explanations. To shed empirical light on this phenomenon, we examined subjects’ bids for one St. Petersburg...
Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard
We argue that people choosing prosocial distribution of goods (e.g., in dictator games) make this choice because they do not want to disappoint their partner rather than because of a direct preference for the chosen pros...
Hedonic products for you, utilitarian products for me
Consumers make trade-offs when they choose between utilitarian and hedonic products. The former is practical, instrumental, and functional, whereas the latter is sensational and experiential. Prior research shows that pe...