Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 5

Abstract

We argue that people choosing prosocial distribution of goods (e.g., in dictator games) make this choice because they do not want to disappoint their partner rather than because of a direct preference for the chosen prosocial distribution. The chosen distribution is a means to fulfil one’s partner’s expectations. We review the economic experiments that corroborate this hypothesis and the experiments that deny that beliefs about others’ expectations motivate prosocial choice. We then formulate hypotheses about what types of expectation motivate someone to do what is expected: these are justifiable hopeful expectations that are clearly about his own choices. We experimentally investigate how people modulate their prosociality when they face low or unreasonably high expectations. In a version of a dictator game, we provide dictators with the opportunity to modulate their transfer as a function of their partner’s expectations. We observe that a significant portion of the population is willing to fulfil their partner’s expectation provided that this expectation expresses a reasonable hope. We conclude that people are averse to disappointing and we discuss what models of social preferences can account for the role of expectations in determining prosocial choice, with a special attention to models of guilt aversion and social esteem.

Authors and Affiliations

Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard

Keywords

Related Articles

Attachment to land: The case of the land of Israel for American and Israeli Jews and the role of contagion

This is a first study on attachment to national and sacred land and land as a protected value. A measure of attachment to the land of Israel is developed and administered to two groups, Jewish college students in Israel...

From group diffusion to ratio bias: Effects of denominator and numerator salience on intuitive risk and likelihood judgments

The group-diffusion effect is the tendency for people to judge themselves to be less likely to experience a negative outcome as the total number of people exposed to the threat increases — even when the probability of th...

The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis

When there are multiple competing objectives in a decision-making process, Multi-Attribute Choice scoring models are excellent tools, permitting the incorporation of both subjective and objective attributes. However, the...

Four challenges for cognitive research on the recognition heuristic and a call for a research strategy shift

The recognition heuristic assumes that people make inferences based on the output of recognition memory. While much work has been devoted to establishing the recognition heuristic as a viable description of how people ma...

How should we measure Americans’ perceptions of socio-economic mobility?

Several scholars have suggested that Americans’ (distorted) beliefs about the rate of upward social mobility in the United States may affect political judgment and decision-making outcomes. In this article, we consider t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678197
  • DOI -
  • Views 148
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard (2015). Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678197