The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 6

Abstract

When there are multiple competing objectives in a decision-making process, Multi-Attribute Choice scoring models are excellent tools, permitting the incorporation of both subjective and objective attributes. However, their accuracy depends upon the subjective techniques used to construct the attribute scales and their concomitant weights. Conventional techniques using local scales tend to overemphasize small differences in attribute measures, which may yield erroneous conclusions. The Range Sensitivity Principle (RSP) is often invoked to adjust attribute weights when local scales are used. In practice, however, decision makers often do not follow the prescriptions of the Range Sensitivity Principle and under-adjust the weights, resulting in potentially poor decisions. Examples are discussed as is a proposed solution: the use of global scales instead of local scales.

Authors and Affiliations

Jamie P. Monat

Keywords

Related Articles

Preference-driven biases in decision makers’ information search and evaluation

While it is well established that the search for information after a decision is biased toward supporting that decision, the case of preference-supporting search before the decision remains open. Three studies of consume...

The value of vulnerability: The transformative capacity of risky trust

In an experimental gift-exchange game, we explore the transformative capacity of vulnerable trust, which we define as trusting untrustworthy players when their untrustworthiness is common knowledge between co-players. In...

Causal explanations affect judgments of the need for psychological treatment

Knowing what event precipitated a client’s abnormal behaviors makes the client appear more normal than if the event is not known (Meehl, 1973). Does such knowledge also influence judgments of the need for psychological t...

An IRT forecasting model: linking proper scoring rules to item response theory

This article proposes an Item Response Theoretical (IRT) forecasting model that incorporates proper scoring rules and provides evaluations of forecasters’ expertise in relation to the features of the specific questions t...

Implementation of the Multiple-Measure Maximum Likelihood strategy classification method in R: Addendum to Glöckner (2009) and practical guide for application

One major challenge to behavioral decision research is to identify the cognitive processes underlying judgment and decision making. Glöckner (2009) has argued that, compared to previous methods, process models can be mor...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677705
  • DOI -
  • Views 119
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Jamie P. Monat (2009). The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(6), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677705