Cultural differences in risk: The group facilitation effect

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2010, Vol 5, Issue 5

Abstract

We compared South Koreans with Australians in order to characterize cultural differences in attitudes and choices regarding risk, at both the individual and group levels. Our results showed that Australians, when assessed individually, consistently self-reported higher preference for risk than South Koreans, regardless of gender. The data revealed that South Koreans, regardless of gender composition, were willing to take greater risks when making decisions in group decision-making situations than when they were alone. This is a different pattern from that seen in the Australian sample, in which a risky shift was noted only among males. This difference was attributed to the influence of various cultural orientations (independent vs. interdependent relationship styles). This study also provides a discussion of the implications of these results in terms of cultural differences in attitudes and decisions regarding risk.

Authors and Affiliations

Do-Yeong Kim and Junsu Park

Keywords

Related Articles

Searching for coherence in a correspondence world

In this paper, I trace the evolution of the aircraft cockpit as an example of the transformation of a probabilistic environment into an ecological hybrid, that is, an environment characterized by both probabilistic and d...

Is there evidence of publication biases in JDM research?

It is a long known problem that the preferential publication of statistically significant results (publication bias) may lead to incorrect estimates of the true effects being investigated. Even though other research area...

Number preferences in lotteries

We explore people’s preferences for numbers in large proprietary data sets from two different lottery games. We find that choice is far from uniform, and exhibits some familiar and some new tendencies and biases. Players...

Self-reported ethical risk taking tendencies predict actual dishonesty

Are people honest about the extent to which they engage in unethical behaviors? We report an experiment examining the relation between self-reported risky unethical tendencies and actual dishonest behavior. Participants’...

Subjective integration of probabilistic information from experience and description

I report a new judgment task designed to investigate the subjective weights allotted to experience and description when integrating information from the two sources. Subjects estimated the percentage of red balls in a ba...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677753
  • DOI -
  • Views 122
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Do-Yeong Kim and Junsu Park (2010). Cultural differences in risk: The group facilitation effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677753