Communicating clinical trial outcomes: Effects of presentation method on physicians’ evaluations of new treatments

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2013, Vol 8, Issue 1

Abstract

Physicians expect a treatment to be more effective when its clinical outcomes are described as relative rather than as absolute risk reductions. We examined whether effects of presentation method (relative vs. absolute risk reduction) remain when physicians are provided the baseline risk information, a vital piece of statistical information omitted in previous studies. Using a between-subjects design, ninety five physicians were presented the risk reduction associated with a fictitious treatment for hypertension either as an absolute risk reduction or as a relative risk reduction, with or without including baseline risk information. Physicians reported that the treatment would be more effective and that they would be more willing to prescribe it when its risk reduction was presented to them in relative rather than in absolute terms. The relative risk reduction was perceived as more effective than absolute risk reduction even when the baseline risk information was explicitly reported. We recommend that information about absolute risk reduction be made available to physicians in the reporting of clinical outcomes. Moreover, health professionals should be cognizant of the potential biasing effects of risk information presented in relative risk terms.

Authors and Affiliations

Francesco Marcatto, Jonathan J. Rolison and Donatella Ferrante

Keywords

Related Articles

A Criticism of Doyle’s survey of time preference: A correction regarding the CRDI and CADI families

Doyle’s (2013) theoretical survey of discount functions criticizes two parametric families abbreviated as CRDI and CADI families. We show that Doyle’s criticisms are based on a mathematical mistake and are incorrect.

Debiasing egocentrism and optimism biases in repeated competitions

When judging their likelihood of success in competitive tasks, people tend to be overoptimistic for easy tasks and overpessimistic for hard tasks (the shared circumstance effect; SCE). Previous research has shown that fe...

Charting the internal landscape: Affect associated with thoughts about major life domains explains life satisfaction

Studies of happiness have examined the impact of demographics, personality and emotions accompanying daily activities on life satisfaction. We suggest that how people feel while contemplating aspects of their lives, incl...

Are additives unnatural? Generality and mechanisms of additivity dominance

Naturalness is important and valued by most lay Western individuals. Yet, little is known about the lay meaning of “natural”. We examine the phenomenon of additivity dominance: adding something to a natural product (addi...

Spontaneous associations and label framing have similar effects in the public goods game

It is known that presentation of a meaningful label (e.g., "The Teamwork Game") can influence decisions in economic games. A common view is that such labels cue associations to preexisting mental models of situations, a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678040
  • DOI -
  • Views 100
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Francesco Marcatto, Jonathan J. Rolison and Donatella Ferrante (2013). Communicating clinical trial outcomes: Effects of presentation method on physicians’ evaluations of new treatments. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678040