Toward understanding everyday decision making by adults across the autism spectrum
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2016, Vol 11, Issue 6
Abstract
We focus on the everyday decision making challenges faced by high functioning adults across the Autism Spectrum using both between- and within-group comparisons. We used Mturk, backed by a combination of recruiting and screening procedures, to recruit large samples using an online survey. The main differences between groups were: greater relationship problems at home, school and work for the ASD group compared to the control group; greater difficulty in a variety of everyday decisions and the negative consequences of their decisions; greater aversion to social risks; lower levels of Rational Ability; and greater personal endorsement of socially undesirable acts. Poorer decision outcomes within the ASD group were predicted by lower levels of Rational Ability and higher personal endorsement of socially undesirable acts. Some of the same predictor-outcome relations were found within the Control group. These results illustrate how the study of unique groups can increase our overall understanding of individual differences in decision making within the general population, and the need to include both between-group and within-group analyses.
Authors and Affiliations
Gary J. Gaeth, Irwin P. Levin, Gaurav Jain and Eleanor V. Burke
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678265
- DOI -
- Views 161
- Downloads 0
Tests of Cumulative Prospect Theory with graphical displays of probability
Recent research reported evidence that contradicts cumulative prospect theory and the priority heuristic. The same body of research also violates two editing principles of original prospect theory: cancellation (the prin...
The price of not putting a price on love
We examine financial challenges of purchasing items that are readily-available yet symbolic of loving relationships. Using weddings and funerals as case studies, we find that people indirectly pay to avoid taboo monetary...
Coherence and correspondence in engineering design: informing the conversation and connecting with judgment and decision-making research
I show how the coherence/correspondence distinction can inform the conversation about decision methods for engineering design. Some engineers argue for the application of multi-attribute utility theory while others argue...
Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference
Risk attitudes implied by valuations of risk-increasing assets depart markedly from those implied by valuations of risk-reducing assets. For instance, many are unwilling to pay the expected value for a risky asset or for...
Using the ACT-R architecture to specify 39 quantitative process models of decision making
Hypotheses about decision processes are often formulated qualitatively and remain silent about the interplay of decision, memorial, and other cognitive processes. At the same time, existing decision models are specified...