Toward understanding everyday decision making by adults across the autism spectrum

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2016, Vol 11, Issue 6

Abstract

We focus on the everyday decision making challenges faced by high functioning adults across the Autism Spectrum using both between- and within-group comparisons. We used Mturk, backed by a combination of recruiting and screening procedures, to recruit large samples using an online survey. The main differences between groups were: greater relationship problems at home, school and work for the ASD group compared to the control group; greater difficulty in a variety of everyday decisions and the negative consequences of their decisions; greater aversion to social risks; lower levels of Rational Ability; and greater personal endorsement of socially undesirable acts. Poorer decision outcomes within the ASD group were predicted by lower levels of Rational Ability and higher personal endorsement of socially undesirable acts. Some of the same predictor-outcome relations were found within the Control group. These results illustrate how the study of unique groups can increase our overall understanding of individual differences in decision making within the general population, and the need to include both between-group and within-group analyses.

Authors and Affiliations

Gary J. Gaeth, Irwin P. Levin, Gaurav Jain and Eleanor V. Burke

Keywords

Related Articles

Children’s application of decision strategies in a compensatory environment

Adaptive actors must be able to use probabilities as decision weights. In a computerized multi-attribute task, the authors examined the decisions of children (5–6 years, n = 44; 9–10 y., n = 39) and adults (21–22 y., n =...

Subjective integration of probabilistic information from experience and description

I report a new judgment task designed to investigate the subjective weights allotted to experience and description when integrating information from the two sources. Subjects estimated the percentage of red balls in a ba...

Moderators of framing effects in variations of the Asian Disease problem: Time constraint, need, and disease type

This study examined framing effects in decisions concerning public health. Tversky and Kahneman’s famous Asian Disease Problem served as experimental paradigm. Subjects chose between a sure and a risky option either pres...

Making decision research useful - not just rewarding

An experienced decision aider reflects on how misaligned priorities produce decision research that is less useful than it could be. Scientific interest and professional standing may motivate researchers - and their funde...

Cognitive integration of recognition information and additional cues in memory-based decisions

Glöckner and Bröder (2011) have shown that for 77.5% of their participants’ decision making behavior in decisions involving recognition information and explicitly provided additional cues could be better described by wei...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678265
  • DOI -
  • Views 150
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Gary J. Gaeth, Irwin P. Levin, Gaurav Jain and Eleanor V. Burke (2016). Toward understanding everyday decision making by adults across the autism spectrum. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(6), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678265