The price of not putting a price on love

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2016, Vol 11, Issue 1

Abstract

We examine financial challenges of purchasing items that are readily-available yet symbolic of loving relationships. Using weddings and funerals as case studies, we find that people indirectly pay to avoid taboo monetary trade-offs. When purchasing items symbolic of love, respondents chose higher price, higher quality items over equally appealing lower price, lower quality items (Study 1), searched less for lower priced items (Study 2) and were less willing to negotiate prices (Study 3). The effect was present for experienced consumers (Study 1), affectively positive and negative events (Study 2), and more routine purchase events (Study 3). Trade-off avoidance, however, was limited to monetary trade-offs associated with loved ones. When either money or love was omitted from the decision context, people were more likely to engage in trade-off reasoning. By abandoning cost-benefit reasoning in order to avoid painful monetary trade-offs, people spend more money than if they engaged in trade-off based behaviors, such as seeking lower cost options or requesting lower prices.

Authors and Affiliations

A. Peter McGraw, Derick F. Davis, Sydney E. Scott and Philip E. Tetlock

Keywords

Related Articles

Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect

Research in judgment and decision making generally ignores the distinction between factual and subjective feelings of ownership, tacitly assuming that the two correspond closely. The present research suggests that this a...

Attribute salience in graphical representations affects evaluation

By manipulating the scale in graphs, this study demonstrated a new evaluation bias caused by attribute salience in graphical representations. That is, (de)compressing the graph axis scale changed the relative distance wi...

How bookies make your money

UK bookies (bookmakers) herd geographically in less-affluent areas. The present work shows that UK bookies also herd with the special bets that they advertise to consumers, both in their shop window advertising and on TV...

Ostracism and fines in a public goods game with accidental contributions: The importance of punishment type

Punishment is an important method for discouraging uncooperative behavior. We use a novel design for a public goods game in which players have explicit intended contributions with accidentally changed actual contribution...

Others’ opinions count, but not all of them: anchoring to ingroup versus outgroup members’ behavior in charitable giving

Because of the large amount of information and the difficulty in selecting an appropriate recipient in the context of charitable giving, people tend to make extensive use of heuristics, which sometimes leads them to wron...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678224
  • DOI -
  • Views 163
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. Peter McGraw, Derick F. Davis, Sydney E. Scott and Philip E. Tetlock (2016). The price of not putting a price on love. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678224