Ostracism and fines in a public goods game with accidental contributions: The importance of punishment type

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2014, Vol 9, Issue 4

Abstract

Punishment is an important method for discouraging uncooperative behavior. We use a novel design for a public goods game in which players have explicit intended contributions with accidentally changed actual contributions, and in which players can apply costly fines or ostracism. Moreover, all players except the subject are automated, whereby we control the intended contributions, actual contributions, costly fines, and ostracisms experienced by the subject. We assess subject’s utilization of other players’ intended and actual contributions when making decisions to fine or ostracize. Hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression provides robust estimates. We find that subjects emphasize actual contribution more than intended contribution when deciding to fine, but emphasize intended contribution more than actual contribution when deciding to ostracize. We also find that the efficacy of past punishment, in terms of changing the contributions of the punished player, influences the type of punishment selected. Finally, we find that the punishment norms of the automated players affect the punishments performed by the subject. These novel paradigms and analyses indicate that punishment is flexible and adaptive, contrary to some evolutionary theories that predict inflexible punishments that emphasize outcomes.

Authors and Affiliations

Torrin M. Liddell and John K. Kruschke

Keywords

Related Articles

Information search in everyday decisions: The generalizability of the attraction search effect

The recently proposed integrated coherence-based decisions and search model (iCodes) makes predictions for search behavior in multi-attribute decision tasks beyond those of classic decision-making heuristics. More precis...

Relativistic financial decisions: Context effects on retirement saving and investment risk preferences

We report a study of the effects the choice set on financial decision making related to retirement savings and risky investment. The participants were presented with either a full range of choice options or a limited sub...

Cross-national in-group favoritism in prosocial behavior: Evidence from Latin and North America

As individuals from different nations increasingly interact with each other, research on national in-group favoritism becomes particularly vital. In a cross-national, large-scale study (N = 915) including representative...

Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test

Much research in cognitive psychology has focused on the tendency to conserve limited cognitive resources. The CRT is the predominant measure of such miserly information processing, and also predicts a number of frequent...

Inverted U-shaped model: How frequent repetition affects perceived risk

We asked how repeated media reports on technological hazards influence an individual’s risk perception. We looked for two contradictory effects, an increasing effect of repetition on perceived risk with the first few rep...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678147
  • DOI -
  • Views 126
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Torrin M. Liddell and John K. Kruschke (2014). Ostracism and fines in a public goods game with accidental contributions: The importance of punishment type. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678147