It pays to be nice, but not really nice: Asymmetric reputations from prosociality across 7 countries
Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 2
Abstract
Cultures differ in many important ways, but one trait appears to be universally valued: prosociality. For one’s reputation, around the world, it pays to be nice to others. However, recent research with American participants finds that evaluations of prosocial actions are asymmetric—relatively selfish actions are evaluated according to the magnitude of selfishness but evaluations of relatively generous actions are less sensitive to magnitude. Extremely generous actions are judged roughly as positively as modestly generous actions, but extremely selfish actions are judged much more negatively than modestly selfish actions (Klein & Epley, 2014). Here we test whether this asymmetry in evaluations of prosociality is culture-specific. Across 7 countries, 1,240 participants evaluated actors giving various amounts of money to a stranger. Along with relatively minor cross-cultural differences in evaluations of generous actions, we find cross-cultural similarities in the asymmetry in evaluations of prosociality. We discuss implications for how reputational inferences can enable the cooperation necessary for successful societies.
Authors and Affiliations
Nadav Klein, Igor Grossmann, Ayse K. Uskul, Alexandra A. Kraus and Nicholas Epley
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP678188
- DOI -
- Views 137
- Downloads 0
Less-is-more effects without the recognition heuristic
Inferences consistent with “recognition-based” decision-making may be drawn for various reasons other than recognition alone. We demonstrate that, for 2-alternative forced-choice decision tasks, less-is-more effects (red...
Mhairi’s Dilemma: A study of decision analysis at work
A case study review of a formal decision analysis involving a 10 year old girl. She had just faced the death of a close adult friend, and had become filled with uncertainty and emotion while facing the decision as to whe...
How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes
In recent years, numerous studies comparing intuition and deliberation have been published. However, relatively little is known about the cognitive processes underlying the two decision modes. In two studies, we analyzed...
People respond to GM food with disgust more than fear: Comment on Royzman, Cusimano and Leeman (2017)
Scott, Inbar and Rozin (2016) reported an association between greater disgust sensitivity (DS) and more negative attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) food. Royzman, Cusimano and Leeman (2017) replicated this assoc...
Bullshit for you; transcendence for me. A commentary on “On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit”
I raise a methodological concern regarding the study performed by Pennycook, Cheyne, Barr, Koehler & Fugelsang (2015), in which they used randomly generated, but syntactically correct, statements that were rated for prof...