It pays to be nice, but not really nice: Asymmetric reputations from prosociality across 7 countries

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2015, Vol 10, Issue 2

Abstract

Cultures differ in many important ways, but one trait appears to be universally valued: prosociality. For one’s reputation, around the world, it pays to be nice to others. However, recent research with American participants finds that evaluations of prosocial actions are asymmetric—relatively selfish actions are evaluated according to the magnitude of selfishness but evaluations of relatively generous actions are less sensitive to magnitude. Extremely generous actions are judged roughly as positively as modestly generous actions, but extremely selfish actions are judged much more negatively than modestly selfish actions (Klein & Epley, 2014). Here we test whether this asymmetry in evaluations of prosociality is culture-specific. Across 7 countries, 1,240 participants evaluated actors giving various amounts of money to a stranger. Along with relatively minor cross-cultural differences in evaluations of generous actions, we find cross-cultural similarities in the asymmetry in evaluations of prosociality. We discuss implications for how reputational inferences can enable the cooperation necessary for successful societies.

Authors and Affiliations

Nadav Klein, Igor Grossmann, Ayse K. Uskul, Alexandra A. Kraus and Nicholas Epley

Keywords

Related Articles

Backward planning: Effects of planning direction on predictions of task completion time

People frequently underestimate the time needed to complete tasks and we examined a strategy – known as backward planning – that may counteract this optimistic bias. Backward planning involves starting a plan at the end...

Cue integration vs. exemplar-based reasoning in multi-attribute decisions from memory: A matter of cue representation

Inferences about target variables can be achieved by deliberate integration of probabilistic cues or by retrieving similar cue-patterns (exemplars) from memory. In tasks with cue information presented in on-screen displa...

The insured victim effect: When and why compensating harm decreases punishment recommendations

An insurance policy may not only affect the consequences for victims but also for perpetrators. In six experiments we find that people recommend milder punishments for perpetrators when the victim was insured, although p...

Is there evidence of publication biases in JDM research?

It is a long known problem that the preferential publication of statistically significant results (publication bias) may lead to incorrect estimates of the true effects being investigated. Even though other research area...

Aging and choice: Applications to Medicare Part D

We examined choice behavior in younger versus older adults using a medical decision-making task similar to Medicare Part D. The study was designed to assess age differences in choice processes in general and specifically...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678188
  • DOI -
  • Views 136
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nadav Klein, Igor Grossmann, Ayse K. Uskul, Alexandra A. Kraus and Nicholas Epley (2015). It pays to be nice, but not really nice: Asymmetric reputations from prosociality across 7 countries. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678188