How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 5

Abstract

In recent years, numerous studies comparing intuition and deliberation have been published. However, relatively little is known about the cognitive processes underlying the two decision modes. In two studies, we analyzed the effects of decision mode instructions on processes of information search and integration, using eye-tracking technology in a between-participants (Study 1) and a within-participants (Study 2) design. Our findings indicate that the instruction to deliberate does not necessarily lead to qualitatively different information processing compared to the instruction to decide intuitively. We found no difference in mean fixation duration and the distribution of short, medium and long fixations. Short fixations in particular prevailed under both decision mode instructions, while long fixations indicating a conscious and calculation-based information processing were rarely observed. Instruction-induced deliberation led to a higher number of fixations, a more complete information search and more repeated information inspections. We interpret our findings as support for the hypothesis that intuitive and deliberate decision modes share the same basic processes which are supplemented by additional operations in the deliberate decision mode.

Authors and Affiliations

Nina Horstmann, Andrea Ahlgrimm and Andreas Glöckner

Keywords

Related Articles

The Short Maximization Inventory

We developed the Short Maximization Inventory (SMI) by shortening the Maximization Inventory (Turner, Rim, Betz & Nygren, 2012) from 34 items to 15 items. Using the Item Response Theory framework, we identified and remov...

Time preference and its relationship with age, health, and survival probability

Although theories from economics and evolutionary biology predict that one’s age, health, and survival probability should be associated with one’s subjective discount rate (SDR), few studies have empirically tested for t...

Moral emotions as determinants of third-party punishment: Anger, guilt, and the functions of altruistic sanctions

Third-party punishment has recently received attention as an explanation for human altruism. Feelings of anger in response to norm violations are assumed to motivate third-party sanctions, yet there is only sparse and in...

The persistence of common-ratio effects in multiple-play decisions

People often make more rational choices between monetary prospects when their choices will be played out many times rather than just once. For example, previous research has shown that the certainty effect and the possib...

Anti-social motives explain increased risk aversion for others in decisions from experience

When deciding for others based on explicitly described odds and outcomes, people often have different risk preferences for others than for themselves. In two pre-registered experiments, we examine risk preference for oth...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677691
  • DOI -
  • Views 171
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nina Horstmann, Andrea Ahlgrimm and Andreas Glöckner (2009). How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677691