How do defendants choose their trial court? Evidence for a heuristic processing account

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2013, Vol 8, Issue 5

Abstract

In jurisdictions with two or more tiers of criminal courts, some defendants can choose the type of trial court to be tried in. This may involve a trade-off between the probability of acquittal/conviction and the estimated severity of sentence if convicted. For instance, in England and Wales, the lower courts have a higher conviction rate but limited sentencing powers, whereas the higher courts have a higher acquittal rate but greater sentencing powers. We examined 255 offenders’ choice of trial court type using a hypothetical scenario where innocence and guilt was manipulated. Participants’ choices were better predicted by a lexicographic than utility maximization model. A greater proportion of “guilty” participants chose the lower court compared to their “innocent” counterparts, and estimated sentence length was more important to the former than latter group. The present findings provide further support for heuristic decision-making in the criminal justice domain, and have implications for legal policy-making.

Authors and Affiliations

Mandeep K. Dhami and David R. Mandel

Keywords

Related Articles

One-reason decision making in risky choice? A closer look at the priority heuristic

Although many models for risky choices between gambles assume that information is somehow integrated, the recently proposed priority heuristic (PH) claims that choices are based on one piece of information only. That is,...

Criteria for performance evaluation

Using a cognitive task (mental calculation) and a perceptual-motor task (stylized golf putting), we examined differential proficiency using the CWS index and several other quantitative measures of performance. The CWS in...

Is the call to prayer a call to cooperate? A field experiment on the impact of religious salience on prosocial behavior

While religiosity is positively correlated with self-reported prosociality, observational and experimental studies on the long-hypothesized connection between religion and prosocial behavior have yielded mixed results. R...

Numeric and graphic risk information processing of high and low numerates in the intuitive and deliberative decision modes: An eye-tracker study

The influence of numeracy on information processing of two risk communication formats (percentage and pictograph) was examined using an eye tracker. A sample from the general population (N = 159) was used. In intuitive a...

Behind the veil of ignorance: Self-serving bias in climate change negotiations

Slowing climate change will almost certainly require a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, but agreement on who should reduce emissions by how much is difficult, in part because of the self-serving bias—the tendency t...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678091
  • DOI -
  • Views 122
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Mandeep K. Dhami and David R. Mandel (2013). How do defendants choose their trial court? Evidence for a heuristic processing account. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678091