Tests of Cumulative Prospect Theory with graphical displays of probability

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2008, Vol 3, Issue 7

Abstract

Recent research reported evidence that contradicts cumulative prospect theory and the priority heuristic. The same body of research also violates two editing principles of original prospect theory: cancellation (the principle that people delete any attribute that is the same in both alternatives before deciding between them) and combination (the principle that people combine branches leading to the same consequence by adding their probabilities). This study was designed to replicate previous results and to test whether the violations of cumulative prospect theory might be eliminated or reduced by using formats for presentation of risky gambles in which cancellation and combination could be facilitated visually. Contrary to the idea that decision behavior contradicting cumulative prospect theory and the priority heuristic would be altered by use of these formats, however, data with two new graphical formats as well as fresh replication data continued to show the patterns of evidence that violate cumulative prospect theory, the priority heuristic, and the editing principles of combination and cancellation. Systematic violations of restricted branch independence also contradicted predictions of “stripped” prospect theory (subjectively weighted additive utility without the editing rules).

Authors and Affiliations

Michael H. Birnbaum, Kathleen Johnson, and Jay-Lee Longbottom

Keywords

Related Articles

It’s not fair: Folk intuitions about disadvantageous and advantageous inequity aversion

People often object to inequity; they react negatively to receiving less than others (disadvantageous inequity aversion), and more than others (advantageous inequity aversion). Here we study people’s folk intuitions abou...

Reversing the causal arrow: Incidence and properties of negative backward magical contagion in Americans

Backward magical contagion describes instances in which individuals (sources) express discomfort or pleasure when something connected to them (medium; e.g., hair, a diary) falls into the possession of a negatively- or po...

Moderators of framing effects in variations of the Asian Disease problem: Time constraint, need, and disease type

This study examined framing effects in decisions concerning public health. Tversky and Kahneman’s famous Asian Disease Problem served as experimental paradigm. Subjects chose between a sure and a risky option either pres...

Valuing bets and hedges: Implications for the construct of risk preference

Risk attitudes implied by valuations of risk-increasing assets depart markedly from those implied by valuations of risk-reducing assets. For instance, many are unwilling to pay the expected value for a risky asset or for...

Cognitive reflection predicts the acceptance of unfair ultimatum game offers

In the ultimatum game, one player proposes a split of money between him- or herself and another player, who can accept the offer (and both players keep the allocated money) or reject the offer (and both players get nothi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677653
  • DOI -
  • Views 143
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michael H. Birnbaum, Kathleen Johnson, and Jay-Lee Longbottom (2008). Tests of Cumulative Prospect Theory with graphical displays of probability. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(7), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677653