COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BATTERY CAGE AND DEEP LITTER POULTRY HOUSING SYSTEMS IN ABIA STATE, NIGERIA

Journal Title: Alanya Akademik Bakış - Year 2018, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

The study was centered on the comparative analysis of battery cage and deep litter poultry housing systems in Abia state, Nigeria. The study specifically examined the factors influencing the choice of poultry housing system in the study area; estimated the profitability of battery cage and deep litter system in the area; analyzed the determinants of profit in battery cage and deep litter systems respectively;and examined the constraints faced by poultry farmers in the area. Primary data source was used for the study. Multi-stage sampling technique was used in the selection of 140 respondents. Descriptive statistics like frequency, tables, charts, etc; profitability index (cost and returns analysis) and multiple regression were the tools of analysis. From the cost and return analysis, it was observed that both housing systems are profitable. The t test result showed that housing system adopted for poultry farms have an effect on the profit. However, it was observed that farmers using deep litter system make more profit when compared to battery cage housing system. It was observed that battery cage system is more capital intensive when compared to deep litter system and this predisposes most famers to favour deep litter housing system to battery cage system. Sex, marital status, education, mortality rate, cost of production, farm size, experience and access to credit were significant variables having varying effects on the profit of battery cage users while sex, household size, education, mortality, cost of production, farm size, experience were the significant variables influencing the returns of deep litter users in the study area. High cost of feeds, inadequate amenities, high interest rates, quality of stock etc. where the major constraints of poultry production in the area. The study recommends that governments should subsidize the cost of feeds to make it affordable for farmers in the study area.

Authors and Affiliations

C. I. OKPOKIRI, N. M AGWU, C. N ONWUSIRIBE

Keywords

Related Articles

Alanya’daki Belediye Hizmetleri Performans Algısının Değerlendirilmesi Üzerine Örnek Bir Çalışma

Yerel halkın ihtiyaç ve beklentilerinin karşılanmasında en etkin kurum belediyelerdir. İhtiyaç ve beklentilerin karşılanması ve bu bağlamda duyulan memnuniyetin ölçülmesi belediyelerin ileriye dönük planlamaları açısında...

An Investigation on Reasons and Results of the Euro Crisis

The European debt crisis or Euro Crisis, emerged in 2007 as a result of the spread of financial and financial crisis, known as the mortgage crisis in the United States, to European countries. The crisis was shaped as a d...

Hazır Giyim Sektöründe Faydacı ve Hedonik Tüketimin Moda Liderliği Üzerine Etkisinin İncelenmesi

Tüketicilerin tüketim tarzları, hedonik ve faydacı tüketim ile moda liderliği davranışları arasındaki ilişkileri belirlemeye yönelik olan bu araştırma, ilişkisel ve betimsel araştırma modelinde kurgulanmıştır. Bu çerçeve...

The Effect of Organizational Culture and Organizational Justice on Knowledge Sharing: Sample of a State University

The main purpose of this study is to determine the effects of culture types and perception of justice of the organization on intention to share knowledge within the organization. Furthermore, it is also aimed to detect t...

The Potential of Bilateral Trade Between Egypt And Nile Basin Countries: A Gravity Model Approach

This research aims at determining the factors affecting the agricultural bilateral trade flows of Egypt with the Nile Basin countries using the gravity model. Basic and Augmented models have been estimated for both Egypt...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP270613
  • DOI 10.29023/alanyaakademik.323449
  • Views 174
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

C. I. OKPOKIRI, N. M AGWU, C. N ONWUSIRIBE (2018). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BATTERY CAGE AND DEEP LITTER POULTRY HOUSING SYSTEMS IN ABIA STATE, NIGERIA. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 2(1), 107-120. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-270613