Comparative analysis of the superficial roughness of high-density composite resins

Journal Title: RSBO - Year 2010, Vol 7, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: The success achieved by the use of composite resins in anterior teeth precipitately leads their use in posterior teeth. However, the indiscriminate application of these materials in cavities with several diverse sizes rapidly pointed out their lack of resistance to oclusal and proximal wear.Objective: To evaluate the surface roughness of composite resin in relation to finishing and polishing technique.Material and methods: Eight experimental groups (n = 15) were divided according to finishing and polishing technique: G1 – Z250TM composite resin without surface finishing and polishing; G2 – Z250TM composite resin plus surface finishing and polishing; G3 – P60TM composite resin without surface finishing and polishing; G4 – P60TM composite resin plus surface finishing and polishing; G5 – Prodigy Condensable TM composite resin without surface finishing and polishing; G6 – Prodigy CondensableTM composite resin plus surface finishing and polishing; G7 – Surefill TM composite resin without surface finishing and polishing; G8 – Surefill TM composite resin plus surface finishing and polishing. Three packable and one microhybrid (control group) composite resin was used. The surface roughness was measured using a profilometer at three points in each sample. The results were evaluated by ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05).Results:Prodigy CondensableTM composite resin showed the lowest surface roughness, while Surefill TM showed the highest surface roughness. Comparing the resins used, only between P60TM and Surefill TM there were no statistically significant differences (p ≥ 0.05).Conclusion: Surface roughness was lower in all types of resin composites surfaces in contact with Mylar matrix strip than in areas submitted to finishing and polishing procedure.

Authors and Affiliations

Renato Queiroz, Daniela Sorte, Marcos Silva, Benícia Ribeiro, Sizenando Porto-Neto, Marcelo Andrade

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative analysis between electromyographic findings of masseter muscle in patients with and without temporomandibular disorder: part I

Introduction: The need to understand the changes of the masseter muscle in the temporomandibular disorders has been leading more often the dental surgeon to work together with other health professionals, with a multi...

The performance of ProTaper system during the endodontic retreatment

The development of new rotary instruments for endodontic treatment demands new studies to evaluate their efficacy on the retreatment of root canals.The scope of this study was to analyze the partial or total removal of t...

In vitro study of apical leakage of root canals after different root apex resection techniques

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate in vitro apical marginal leakage of root canals after three root apex resection techniques. Material and methods: Thirty maxillary canines were prepared chemo-me...

Retratamento de recheios Thermafil com o Sistema ProFile 0,04, 350 2000rpm OU

Este estudo visou determinar uma Qualidade de Remoção do Sistema Thermafil Retratamento endodôntico não com um UTILIZAÇÃO do Sistema Dois ProFile 0,04, Diferentes Velocidades. Trinta caninos inferiores unirradiculares F...

Keratocystic odontogenic tumor

Introduction: The keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KOT) is a lesion that requires special considerations due to its clinical behavior and specific histopathological aspects. This study aims to present a case of KOT emphas...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP124086
  • DOI -
  • Views 172
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Renato Queiroz, Daniela Sorte, Marcos Silva, Benícia Ribeiro, Sizenando Porto-Neto, Marcelo Andrade (2010). Comparative analysis of the superficial roughness of high-density composite resins. RSBO, 7(4), 414-421. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-124086