Comparative assessment of side effects of etomidate and propofol: A double blinded study from urban Karnataka

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2019, Vol 9, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: Propofol and Etomidate is commonly used in anaesthesia practice. However pain on injection and myoclonus are the most common side effects of this drug. Objectives: To compare the side effects between Etomidate and Propofol. Methodology: In this prospective randomized double blinded study, we studied 60 patients randomly allocated into either group P (propofol group) or to group E (Etomidate group) of 30 each. All patients premedicated with inj. midazolam 0.02mg/kg IV, inj. Fentanyl 2 microgm/kg IV. Group P received propofol infusion at 0.5 mg/kg/hr and group E at 0.05mg/kg/hr until BIS value dropped to 50. Then patients were intubated with vecuronium 0.1mg/kg and anaesthesia maintained according to institutional protocol followed by extubation after adequate recovery. Hemodynamic parameters and side effects during induction were recorded between both groups until the infusion of study drug. Results: So prevalence of myoclonus was found to be 40% in Etomidate group. Prevalence of Thrombophlebitis in etomidate was found to be 13.3%. Proportion of patients experienced pain was more in Propofol group i.e. 36.7% as compared to Etomidate i.e. 20%. (>0.05). 10 patients in Etomidate group experienced nausea i.e. 33.3% as compared to 2 in Propofol group i.e. 6.7%. (<0.05). 3 patients in Etomidate group experienced vomiting i.e. 10% as compared to 1 in Propofol group i.e. 3.3% (>0.05) Conclusion: Myoclonus and Thrombophlebitis was observed in Etomidate group only (<0.05). Propofol causes more pain as compared to Etomidate (>0.05). Propofol causes less nausea (<0.05) and vomiting (<0.05) as compared to Etomidate.

Authors and Affiliations

Ramesh babu, Mohan . , Prashanth Vadigeri, Sunil Kumar, Rajashekar Mudaraddi

Keywords

Related Articles

A study of renal manifestations in hypothyroid patients found during pre anesthetic check up

Background: Thyroid hormone influences renal development, kidney structure, renal heamodynamics, GFR, the functions of many transport system along nephron, sodium and water homeostasis Disorder of thyroid function can re...

Comparison of hemodynamic stability of combined spinal anesthesia with low dose spinal anesthesia and epidural volume extension by saline as compared to epidural anaesthesia for patients undergoing elective lower limb surgery

Administration of saline in epidural space following intrathecal drug administration constitutes Epidural Volume Extension. In our study we involved 40 patients who were planned to undergo elective lower limb surgery, wh...

A clinical comparative study between Rocuronium and Suxamethonium for endotracheal intubation

Background: This is a prospective randomized study done to compare the two drugs namely Rocuronium bromide and suxamethonium for tracheal intubation and further to evaluate whether Rocuronium bromide can be an acceptable...

Efficacy of low dose intrathecal clonidine as an adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia

Background and Aims: Nowadays intrathecally various drugs adjvents are being used for the purpose of enhancing spinal action of local anaesthetic agents hence postoperative analgesia. The aim of this study was to observe...

A prospective study on the management of proximal humerus fractures treated with proximal humerus nail (PHN)

Background: Proximal humeral fractures, defined as fractures occurring at or proximal to the surgical neck of the humerus is the commonest fracture affecting the shoulder girdle in adults and its incidence is rising. Mat...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP521033
  • DOI 10.26611/10159210
  • Views 137
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ramesh babu, Mohan . , Prashanth Vadigeri, Sunil Kumar, Rajashekar Mudaraddi (2019). Comparative assessment of side effects of etomidate and propofol: A double blinded study from urban Karnataka. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 9(2), 133-136. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-521033