Comparative assessment of side effects of etomidate and propofol: A double blinded study from urban Karnataka

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2019, Vol 9, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: Propofol and Etomidate is commonly used in anaesthesia practice. However pain on injection and myoclonus are the most common side effects of this drug. Objectives: To compare the side effects between Etomidate and Propofol. Methodology: In this prospective randomized double blinded study, we studied 60 patients randomly allocated into either group P (propofol group) or to group E (Etomidate group) of 30 each. All patients premedicated with inj. midazolam 0.02mg/kg IV, inj. Fentanyl 2 microgm/kg IV. Group P received propofol infusion at 0.5 mg/kg/hr and group E at 0.05mg/kg/hr until BIS value dropped to 50. Then patients were intubated with vecuronium 0.1mg/kg and anaesthesia maintained according to institutional protocol followed by extubation after adequate recovery. Hemodynamic parameters and side effects during induction were recorded between both groups until the infusion of study drug. Results: So prevalence of myoclonus was found to be 40% in Etomidate group. Prevalence of Thrombophlebitis in etomidate was found to be 13.3%. Proportion of patients experienced pain was more in Propofol group i.e. 36.7% as compared to Etomidate i.e. 20%. (>0.05). 10 patients in Etomidate group experienced nausea i.e. 33.3% as compared to 2 in Propofol group i.e. 6.7%. (<0.05). 3 patients in Etomidate group experienced vomiting i.e. 10% as compared to 1 in Propofol group i.e. 3.3% (>0.05) Conclusion: Myoclonus and Thrombophlebitis was observed in Etomidate group only (<0.05). Propofol causes more pain as compared to Etomidate (>0.05). Propofol causes less nausea (<0.05) and vomiting (<0.05) as compared to Etomidate.

Authors and Affiliations

Ramesh babu, Mohan . , Prashanth Vadigeri, Sunil Kumar, Rajashekar Mudaraddi

Keywords

Related Articles

A prospective randomised comparison of nasogastric tube insertion of two different techniques in anesthetised intubated patients

Background: Nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion is indicated almost routine procedure in patients undergoing below diaphragmatic surgery to decompress the stomach perioperatively. Insertion of NG Tin an naesthetised, intuba...

Airway management and anaesthesia in maxillofacial trauma

Maxillofacial trauma forms a major part of patients attending emergency department because of the frequency and abundant occurrence. Management of airway is pivotal due to distorted anatomy, urgency of establishing airwa...

Comparative study between epidural tramadol vs buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia

Aim: This study was designed to compare the postoperative analgesia between tramadol and Buprenorphine through an epidural technique in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries based on the onset of analgesia, its d...

Evaluation of the effects of P6 acupressure application on postoperative nausea and vomiting during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are most common and distressing complication of anesthesia. Acupressure at P6 acupoint is non-pharmacological method which can reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting...

Efficacy of I-gel laryngeal mask airways in mechanically ventilated patients

Background: I-gel is a new single use, non-inflatable supraglottic device for both spontaneous and controlled ventilation. It mirrors the laryngeal anatomy design. A supraglottic airway without an inflatable cuff has pot...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP521033
  • DOI 10.26611/10159210
  • Views 191
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ramesh babu, Mohan . , Prashanth Vadigeri, Sunil Kumar, Rajashekar Mudaraddi (2019). Comparative assessment of side effects of etomidate and propofol: A double blinded study from urban Karnataka. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 9(2), 133-136. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-521033