Comparative Evaluation of Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography versus Fundus Fluorescein Angiography for the detection of Diabetic Macular Edema

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 10

Abstract

Background: Drastic incidence of DME in largest populated nation in world has direct effect on VTDR which is the major cause of irreversible blindness in DR subjects. Therefore, the need for reliable, safe and real time detection of DME is an utmost need for detection and prevention of the disease. Hence, the purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of two well known diagnostic tools, SD-OCT & FFA for the detection of DME. Methods: A prospective study was carried out on 308 eyes of 154 type II DM patients to compare the detection potential between two popular Retinal Diagnostic Techniques, SD-OCT and FFA for DME. The parameters such as focal macular edema, diffuse macular edema and mixed edema were evaluated with FFA. Afterwards, IR edema, sub retinal fluid and mixed edema were diagnosed with SD-OCT for the same pool of patients. Clinical features in DME using reference ‘EDTRS’ scale of measurement. Results: Noninvasively 305 (99.1%) eyes were detected positive for various type of DME by SD-OCT similarly 282 (91.6) eyes were detected positive by FFA. The prevalence of different types of DME such as cystoids, diffuse, focal and mixed was 7.8%, 13%, 7.1% and 63.7% as diagnosed with FFA. Whereas, SRF, IR edema and mixed was 4.9%, 3.6% and 90.6% as diagnosed with SD-OCT. DME was not detected by FFA 8.4% of overall study population. Whereas, DME was not detected 0.9% eyes by SD-OCT. Overall performance was better in detection of DME with SD-OCT compared to FFA. Conclusion: The present study showed the efficacy of SD-OCT over FFA in Reliable and safe detection of DME in Type II Diabetic Mellitus patients were significantly more by SD-OCT and was easy and comparable to diagnostic findings of FFA specifically in cases of sub retinal macular as well choroidal edema due DME by SD-OCT

Authors and Affiliations

Prof. Veshal Madan

Keywords

Related Articles

Histopathological Evaluation of Myometrial Lesions of Corpus Uterus-A Tertiary Care Hospital Based Study

The aim of the study was to evaluate the distribution of various types of myometrial lesion (both neoplastic and non-neoplastic) in the hysterectomy and myomectomy specimens received in our institution. The pattern of oc...

Post Operative Infection in Surgical Wards and Factors Influencing the Infection Rate in Tertiary Care Hospital

A prospective study of 1428 surgical wounds was conducted. All the wounds were examined for presence of infection and those with infection were studied bacteriologic ally. The overall infection rate is 4% (58). Klebsiell...

Epidemiology of Chikungunya Fever Outbreak in Tangerang District, Indonesia 2016

Introduction: Chikungunya fever is a vector-borne disease caused by the Chikungunya virus, first discovered in Tanzania 1952. Chikungunya virus transmitted to humans through the bite of Aedes spp. Chikungunya fever provi...

To Compare the Dose of Propofol for Induction of Anaesthesia by Entropy Monitoring against Standard Induction dose in Elderly Patients

Background: Entropy monitoring is a new method for measuring depth of anaesthesia and degree of hypnosis. Two parameters are displayed in the monitor -State entropy (SE) and Response entropy (RE). Aging lead to decrease...

Reliability & Validity of The Hindi Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy For The Gallbladder Cancer

Background and objective The efforts to monitor quality of life (QOL) are increasing. However, the nonavailability of a valid and reliable tool in the local language is a common problem. Cross-culturally sensitive tools...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP529722
  • DOI -
  • Views 68
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Prof. Veshal Madan (2017). Comparative Evaluation of Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography versus Fundus Fluorescein Angiography for the detection of Diabetic Macular Edema. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 5(10), 29624-29630. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-529722