Comparative Evaluation of the Depth of Cure and Degree of Conversion of Two Bulk Fill Flowable Composites
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2017, Vol 11, Issue 8
Abstract
Introduction: Since the development of resin based composites, several improvements have been made to improve their physical and chemical properties. In an attempt to fasten and simplify the restoration process, a new class of resin based composite materials, called the bulk fill resin based composites have been introduced, which has been claimed to achieve a depth of cure of 4 mm without affecting the properties of the material. Aim: To comparatively evaluate the depth of cure of two different bulk fill flowable composite resins by ISO 4049 method and to evaluate the degree of conversion of the same composite resins with Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy method. Materials and Methods: Composite resin specimens (n=10) per group were prepared with bulk fill flowable composites, Surefil SDR flow (Dentsply Caulk, Milford, DE, USA) designated as Group A and Filtek bulk fill (3M ESPE, St.Paul, MN, USA) designated as Group B. Depth of cure was determined according to “ISO 4049; Depth of Cure” method, and FTIR spectroscopy method was used to estimate the degree of conversion of both the bulk fill flowable composites. The degree of conversion of monomer to polymer was estimated individually in coronal half (Group A1 and B1) and pulpal half (Group A2 and Group B2) by dividing each specimens into two halves. The data were analysed using Student’s unpaired t-test at 5% level of significance. Results: The mean depth of cure of Group A was 3.89 mm (±0.103) and for Group B was 3.54 mm (±0.129). The degree of conversion percentage for Group A1=78.51 (±47.8), Group A2= 31.9 (±22.4), Group B1=39.8 (±5.2), Group B2=37.4 (±6.4). Statistical analysis revealed significant difference in the depth of cure between the two bulk fill flowable composites with Group A higher than Group B. The degree of conversion of the coronal half of Group A1 was significantly higher when compared to Group B1. Conclusion: Surefil SDR bulk fill resin has better depth of cure and degree of conversion compared to Filtek bulk fill composites.
Authors and Affiliations
CA Anand Yokesh, P Hemalatha, M Muthalagu, M Robert Justin
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP362027
- DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28004.10444
- Views 69
- Downloads 0
Rectus Sheath Haematoma Secondary to Enoxaparin Injection- A Rare Case Report
Rectus sheath haematoma is a well-documented condition with an elusive diagnosis. It is an uncommon complication of anti-coagulation therapy, which can have a mortality of upto 25%. The patient discussed here is a 40-yea...
Hepatitis B Core Antibody Negativity in a Chronic Hepatitis B Infected Patient: Report of an Unusual Serological Pattern
Diagnosis of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) infection is established by the presence of various hepatitis B serological and molecular markers. Expression of these serological markers may vary in natural course of HBV infection....
Staged Hard and Soft Tissue Reconstruction Followed by Implant Supported Restoration in the Aesthetic Zone: A Case Report
Alveolar ridge deficiency is a common clinical consequence following tooth loss due to chronic periodontitis complicating ideal implant placement. Advanced hard and soft tissue augmentation procedures have been developed...
Adnexal Torsion: Clinical Presentations and Challenges
ABSTRACT Introduction: Adnexal torsion contributes to 2.7-7.4% of all gynaecological emergencies and delayed or misdiagnosis results in loss of ovarian function. Diagnosis is not straight forward, both clinically and rad...
Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Immersion A-scan Ultrasound Biometry and Optical Biometry in Cases Undergoing Small Incision Cataract Surgery
ABSTRACT Introduction: At present, refractive accuracy is the demand of cataract surgery which can be achieved by providing precise post-operative vision without spectacles. One of the important factors required to give...