Comparative Evaluation of the Depth of Cure and Degree of Conversion of Two Bulk Fill Flowable Composites
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2017, Vol 11, Issue 8
Abstract
Introduction: Since the development of resin based composites, several improvements have been made to improve their physical and chemical properties. In an attempt to fasten and simplify the restoration process, a new class of resin based composite materials, called the bulk fill resin based composites have been introduced, which has been claimed to achieve a depth of cure of 4 mm without affecting the properties of the material. Aim: To comparatively evaluate the depth of cure of two different bulk fill flowable composite resins by ISO 4049 method and to evaluate the degree of conversion of the same composite resins with Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy method. Materials and Methods: Composite resin specimens (n=10) per group were prepared with bulk fill flowable composites, Surefil SDR flow (Dentsply Caulk, Milford, DE, USA) designated as Group A and Filtek bulk fill (3M ESPE, St.Paul, MN, USA) designated as Group B. Depth of cure was determined according to “ISO 4049; Depth of Cure” method, and FTIR spectroscopy method was used to estimate the degree of conversion of both the bulk fill flowable composites. The degree of conversion of monomer to polymer was estimated individually in coronal half (Group A1 and B1) and pulpal half (Group A2 and Group B2) by dividing each specimens into two halves. The data were analysed using Student’s unpaired t-test at 5% level of significance. Results: The mean depth of cure of Group A was 3.89 mm (±0.103) and for Group B was 3.54 mm (±0.129). The degree of conversion percentage for Group A1=78.51 (±47.8), Group A2= 31.9 (±22.4), Group B1=39.8 (±5.2), Group B2=37.4 (±6.4). Statistical analysis revealed significant difference in the depth of cure between the two bulk fill flowable composites with Group A higher than Group B. The degree of conversion of the coronal half of Group A1 was significantly higher when compared to Group B1. Conclusion: Surefil SDR bulk fill resin has better depth of cure and degree of conversion compared to Filtek bulk fill composites.
Authors and Affiliations
CA Anand Yokesh, P Hemalatha, M Muthalagu, M Robert Justin
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP362027
- DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28004.10444
- Views 77
- Downloads 0
Evaluation of C-Reactive Protein and Fibrinogen in Patients with Chronic and Aggressive Periodontitis: A Clinico-Biochemical Study
Introduction: Periodontal disease is characterised by chronic infection and inflammation in periodontal tissues leading to destruction of alveolar bone with subsequent tooth loss. Periodontal infections are the result of...
Comparison of Voiding Cystourethrogram with Cystoscopy in the Prediction of Presence of Posterior Urethral Valve
ABSTRACT Introduction: Posterior Urethral Valves (PUVs) are a major cause of short and long term morbidity in male children. They cause recurrent urinary tract infections and lead to chronic renal failure in a significan...
Introducing a Favourite Tip Definition and Projection with Tripod Suture in Rhinoplasty
Introduction: Surgical manipulation of the lower lateral cartilages of nasal tip could cause subtle but significant responses to the manipulation. The suture-techniques almost always offer a reliable and dramatic method...
Citral, A Monoterpene Protect Against High Glucose Induced Oxidative Injury in HepG2 Cell In Vitro-An Experimental Study
Introduction: Diabetes mellitus, a major metabolic disorder associated with hyperglycaemia is one of the leading cause of death in many developed countries. However, use of natural phytochemicals have been proved to have...
Prosthetic Rehabilitation of a Large Frontal Cranial Defect-A Case Report
ABSTRACT With an increased incidence of automobile accidents, head injuries in road traffic accident victims are common. In order to salvage the vital intra-cranial structures from the effects of trauma, emergency attent...