Comparative Evaluation of two Different Intravenous Doses of Midazolam to Aid the Insertion of LMA Classic as Adjuvants to Propofol Anaesthesia

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 3

Abstract

Background: Propofol is a widely accepted medication for the uccessful insertion of laryngeal mask airway, but as a sole induction agent, it has a very low success rate. A number of co-induction agents have been used with propofol to increase the success rate of LMA insertion. Aim and Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of two different doses of midazolam i.e. 0.05 mg/kg and 0.08 mg/kg intravenously when used with propofol versus propofol alone for LMA insertion. To find the appropriate dose of midazolam that provides ideal condition and maximum haemodynamic stability. Material & Methods: 75 adult patients of ASA I & II grade randomly divided into 3 groups. Group P: Propofol + Saline Group PM1: Midazolam 0.05 mg/kg 3 minutes before propofol + Propofol Group PM2: Midazolam 0.08 mg/kg 3 minutes before propofol + Propofol. LMA insertion attempted 1 minute after the administration of Propofol. Total dose of propofol used, the insertion conditions and haemodynamic changes were noted. Results: There was no statistical difference in demographic profile. Haemodynamically patients were more stable in group PM1 & PM2 than in group P. Dose of propofol used in PM2 (2.05+0.21 in mg/kg) & PM1 (2.38+0.21) was less than in Group P (2.84 mg/kg). 100% success rate in LMA insertion was observed in group PM1 & PM2 in first attempt whereas it was 80% in group P. 88% in group PM2, 60% in group PM1 & only 32% patients in group P had excellent insertion conditions. Conclusion: Propofol as a sole agent does not provide LMA insertion conditions. Midazolam when used with propofol provides adequate conditions for LMA insertion in a dose dependent manner.

Authors and Affiliations

Geetanjali Pushkarna

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparison of Paravertebral Block and Interpleural Block in Patients Undergoing Breast Surgery Under General Anaesthesia

Background and Aims: Paravertebral and interpleural blocks are indicated for providing intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in unilateral surgeries of the chest and abdomen. The aim of this study was to evaluate th...

Efficacy of Epidural 0.75% Ropivacaine vs. Epidural 0.5% Bupivacaine for Adult Patients undergoing Major Lower Abdominal Surgeries: A Double Blind Randomized Control Study

Context: In view of the wider application of regional anesthetic procedure in modern anaesthesia practice, there is a need for local anesthetic with desirable properties like longer duration of sensory blockade for post...

Comparison of Intravenous Tramadole versus Rectal Tramadole for Postoperative Analgesia Following Appendectomy

Background and Aim: Tramadol is atypical opioid having central as well as peripheral analgesic action. It acts on opioid receptors as well as having effect on neuronal reuptake of nor epinephrine and serotonin. In this s...

Efficacy of Right Superficial Cervical Plexus Block and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Relief of Shoulder Pain in Laparoscopic Surgery Under Spinal Anaesthesia: A Feasibility Study

Background and Aim: Laparoscopic procedures are conventionally done under general anaesthesia for avoiding patient discomforts and shoulder pain due to pneumoperitoneum that occur during laparoscopy under spinal anaesthe...

Difficult airway Assessment: Comparison of Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT) and Modified Mallampati Test (MMT)

Airway management is most important job of anaesthesiologists. Difficult airway is assessed mainly comparing different parameters of airway assessment. In this study we mainly compare Upper Lip Bite test (ULBT) and Modif...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP619605
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6319.1
  • Views 77
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Geetanjali Pushkarna (2019). Comparative Evaluation of two Different Intravenous Doses of Midazolam to Aid the Insertion of LMA Classic as Adjuvants to Propofol Anaesthesia. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 6(3), 697-704. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-619605