Effect of Inj. Dexmedetomidine and Inj. Clonidine on Haemodynamic Changes during Laryngoscopy &Tracheal Intubation: A Comparative Study

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 4

Abstract

Aim and Objectives: 1. To evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine and clonidine on haemodynamic changes during Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. 2. To compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and clonidine on haemodynamic changes during Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. 3. To compare the side effects. Materials & Methods: After approval of the institutional ethical committee, this prospective observational study was conducted on 60 patients of ASA Grade I & II , undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia. Group A: Injection Dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg diluted to 20ml with normal saline were given over 10 minutes. Group B: Injection. Clonidine 2mcg/kg diluted to 20ml with normal saline were given over 10 minutes. All patient received Injection Pentazocine 0.3mg/kg and were pre-oxygenated for 3minute Anaesthesia was induced with thiopantone sodium (5mg/kg intravenous) till loss of eyelashreflex over 30 second and mask ventilation was confirmed. Injection succhinylcholine 1.5mg/kg was given to facilitate laryngoscopy and intubation. anaesthesia was maintained with oxygen nitrous oxide, halothane with intermittent use of injection Atracurium and controlled ventilation. At the end of surgery the neuromuscular blockade was antagonized with injection Glycopyrolate (.01mg/kg) Intavenou. and injection Neostigmine (.05mg/kg) i.v. and patient were extubated. Result: Dexmedetomidine is more effective than Clonidine in attenuation of haemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and intubation. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine significantly attenuates the haemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and intubation. Clonidine also significantly attenuates the haemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and intubation.Thus we conclude that Dexmedetomidine is a better drug to attenuate the haemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and intubation.

Authors and Affiliations

Abhay Raj Yadav

Keywords

Related Articles

A Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia in Children

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia in children for infraumblical surgeries as regional anaesthesia in children and ambulatory setup is gaining popularity. Materials and Me...

Evaluation of Pain and Phlebitis using Topical Heparin Solution at Central and Peripheral venous Punctures

Background: Phlebitis refers to the inflammation of a vein which can occur after repetitive intravenous injections through peripheral or central venous cannulation. Various preventive modalities are available but, none h...

Study of Prescription Pattern of Analgesics in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients with Solid Tumors in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Retrospective Study

This study evaluated the prescribing pattern of analgesics in very terminal ill cancer patients who succumbed to their illness in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in the Medical R...

Coming out of our Comfort Zone

Conventionally, anesthesiologists practice as perioperative physician, providing preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative care to their surgical patients. Though primarily they focus on providing anesthesia to the...

Comparative Efficacy of General Anaesthesia versus Spinal Anaesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Comparative efficacy of general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Objective: The aim was to compare general anaesthesia and spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cholecystectomy eva...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP535386
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5418.4
  • Views 80
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Abhay Raj Yadav (2018). Effect of Inj. Dexmedetomidine and Inj. Clonidine on Haemodynamic Changes during Laryngoscopy &Tracheal Intubation: A Comparative Study. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 5(4), 528-535. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-535386