COMPARATIVE METHODS FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE NATURAL RISK FACTORS’ IMPORTANCE

Journal Title: Present Environment and Sustainable Development - Year 2011, Vol 5, Issue 1

Abstract

Among the methods for the evaluation of natural and anthropic risks, those of the questionnaire and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) allow evidencing the exposure degree to hazards and also the assessment of factor weights in human communities’ degree of vulnerability. In the present study, the two methods have been applied in the analysis of the territory of Lepşa-Greşu Depression, located in Vrancea Mountains from the Eastern Carpathians, potentially threatened by different risk phenomena, such as heavy rains, flash floods, landslides and earthquakes. The application of the questionnaire revealed a weak and diffuse perception on the risk phenomena among the population and also correlations and variations in risk perception caused by several factors, such as age and socio-economic status. AHP allowed to obtain the preference weights of the four analyzed factors in the vulnerability of the region, evidencing the higher importance of the “floods” factor in comparison to the others, and as a consequence the necessity or reorienting the efforts of developing practices and projects of risk reduction in the region.

Authors and Affiliations

Adrian Grozavu, Sergiu Pleşcan, Ciprian Mărgărint

Keywords

Related Articles

The shifting relationship between urban and spatial planning and the protection of the environment: Romania as a case study

Processes driven by human communities are the core causes of transformations occurring in natural systems. While the environment is a whole, composed of natural and man-dominated subsystems, space is limited and the two...

AMBIENT WELL-BEING PARAMETERS IN THE INDOOR SPACES OF OFFICE BUILDINGS. CASE STUDY

This study highlights the variation values of several important microclimatic parameters inside an office building. This way, during one year time period, from February 2010 to February 2011,, we have recorded the natura...

EVALUATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SITUATION OF RURAL GEOSYSTEMS OF NORTHEN BUKOVINA 

The article presents the theoretical and methodological foundations of landscape- geochemical analysis and an evaluation of Northern Bukovina rural geosystems. Based on the results of field and chemical analysis, calcula...

ZINC REGIME IN THE SEWAGE SLUDGE-SOIL-PLANT SYSTEM OF A CITY WASTE WATER TREATMENT POND

The sewage sludge from wastewater treatment plant of Iasi, a city with 300,000 inhabitants, for domestic and industrial origin, was stored in a mud pond arranged on an area of 18,920 m2. Chemical analyzes of the sludge s...

DETERMINING THE PROTECTION AREAS FOR THE MAIN CAPTURES WHICH EXPLOITS THE FREE LEVEL AQUIFER FROM THE SOUTH DOBROGEADETERMINING THE PROTECTION AREAS FOR THE MAIN CAPTURES WHICH EXPLOITS THE FREE LEVEL AQUIFER FROM THE SOUTH DOBROGEA 

 This paper was elaborated in order to establish the protection zones of the main capture exploiting limestone aquifer stationed in South Dobrogea, Sarmatian age. To achieve this goal, we used the mathematical model...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP160777
  • DOI -
  • Views 114
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Adrian Grozavu, Sergiu Pleşcan, Ciprian Mărgărint (2011). COMPARATIVE METHODS FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE NATURAL RISK FACTORS’ IMPORTANCE. Present Environment and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 33-40. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-160777