Comparative Study between Intravenous Clonidine and Intravenous Fentanyl to Attenuate Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation

Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2019, Vol 6, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: Laryngoscopy and intubation are associated with acute hemodynamic responses. In susceptible patients even this short period (2-7 minutes) of hypertension and tachycardia can result in myocardial ischemia or increased intracranial pressure. Aims and objectives: To evaluate and compare the effect of intravenous (I.V.) Fentanyl and intravenous (I.V.) Clonidine in attenuating the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Settings and design: This study was designed to compare the effect of I.V. Fentanyl and I.V. Clonidine in attenuating the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Methods and material: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, comparative study was conducted on 60 patients, randomly allocated into two groups of 30 each i.e. group C and group F receiving 2mcg/kg Clonidine and 2mcg/kg Fentanyl, respectively, 5 minutes prior to induction. Hemodynamic parameters and postoperative sedation scores were recorded. Statistical analysis: Mean ± standard deviation for quantitative continuous data and compared by unpaired t-test. Result: The hemodynamic variables in Fentanyl group were significantly lower than Clonidine group for the first five minutes after laryngoscopy and intubation. Conclusion: Both fentanyl and clonidine were able to attenuate the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation, however, fentanyl 2 mcg/kg I.V. given 5 min prior to intubation kept the hemodynamic variables significantly lower than those seen in clonidine 2 mcg/kg I.V. given 5 min prior to intubation. However, after 5 min of intubation the effects of both the drugs were comparable.

Authors and Affiliations

Smita Joshi

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparision of Intrathecal Fentanyl and Clonidine with 0.5% of Bupivacaine Heavy in Spinal Anaesthesia in Elderly Urological Surgeries

Background: Lipophilic opioids (fentanyl) and alpha-2 agonist (clonidine) are increasingly being administered intrathecally as adjuncts. They enhance the effect of spinal anaesthesia without prolonging motor recovery and...

Efficacy of Laryngoscopy and Haemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation: A Comparitive Study between Airtraq Optical Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope

Background: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation plays a crucial role in administering general anaesthesia. Laryngoscopes ranging from simple rigid scope with light bulb to complex...

Compare the Efficacy of Classical Subarachnoid Block Using and Unilateral Spinal Anaesthesia

Aim : To compare the efficacy of classical subarachnoid block using 0.5% bupivacaine (3.5 ml) and unilateral spinal anaesthesia using 0.5% bupivacaine (2ml) in patients undergoing unilateral lower limb surgeries. Materia...

Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Inserted in Prone Position versus Routine Endotracheal Intubation for Prone Surgeries

Background: Providing anaesthesia in prone position is a challenging task for an anaesthesiologist. Although the favourable technique of airway management has been endotracheal tube (ETT), alternative airway management w...

The Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilisation Surgeries: A Randomised Control Study

Background: Transversus abdominis plane block is a safe, simple and effective technique, widely used to provide postoperative analgesia for various abdominal surgeries. We evaluated the efficacy of Transversus abdominis...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP600658
  • DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6119.18
  • Views 64
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Smita Joshi (2019). Comparative Study between Intravenous Clonidine and Intravenous Fentanyl to Attenuate Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation. Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia, 6(1), 122-134. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-600658