Comparative Study of Conventional Versus Nasal-18 Method for Fiberoptic Nasal Intubation
Journal Title: Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia - Year 2018, Vol 5, Issue 7
Abstract
Background: Fiberoptic nasal intubation (FONI) is an effective technique for establishing airway access in patients with both anticipated and unanticipated difficult airways. Utilization of fiberscope without the use of any facilitating techniques has proven to be a difficult task. In this study we compare conventional versus Nasal- 18 method for fiberoptic nasal intubation. Aims and Objectives: To compare time for successful FONI in both the groups. To see procedure related adverse effects. Method: A randomized controlled trial was carried out at our hospital. Fifty patients aged 20-60 years with American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class I and II undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were allocated to two groups of fiber optic nasal intubation using either the Nasal -18 technique or the conventional method. In the Nasal- 18 group, a nasal tube was gently inserted into the nasopharynx till mark 18, then a fiberscope was glided over it and advanced through the nasal cavity till the glottis could be visualized. Finally the nasal tube was rolled over the fiberscope. Time from the start of insertion of fiberscope into nares till visualization of vocal cord (T1) and from visualization of vocal cord to complete intubation (T2) was recorded. Result: T1 values in nasal 18 and conventional group were 33.16±7.96 and 56.76±17.08 seconds respectively [p < 0.05]. T2 duration were 35.16±9.83 and 31.20±6.89 seconds in nasal 18 and conventional group respectively [p = 0.10]. Conclusion: Nasasl- 18 method significantly reduces the time to visualize the glottis compare to conventional technique for FONI. This method should be added as a preferred technique to facilitate FONI.
Authors and Affiliations
Asmita Chaudhary
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP533788
- DOI 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5718.6
- Views 102
- Downloads 0
A Comparison Between Airtraq Optical Laryngoscope and Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope for Intubation in Adult Surgical Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Tracheal intubation using a laryngoscope is considered as a gold standard 1 of airway management during administration of general anesthesia and also in critical care settings because of its several advantages including...
Evaluation of Low Dose Dexmeditomedine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine 0.25% in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks
Context: The assessment of the efficacy of low dose (30 micrograms) of dexmeditomedine added to 0.25% bupivacaine was studied for the prolongation of the duration of sensory and motor block in supraclavicular brachial pl...
Neostigmine as an Adjuvant to Paediatric Caudal Analgesia
Caudal analgesia is one of the most popular method for intra and post-operative method for abdominal, perennial and lower limb surgeries for children’s. For local anesthetic common drug used is Bupivacaine. In children c...
Comparison of Fentanyl and Midazolam as Adjuvants to Low Dose Isobaric Ropivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia for Transuretheral Resection of Prostate
Background: Spinal ropivacaine provides differential anaesthesia with a higher sensory than motor block and is less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine. Small doses of ropivacaine (10- 15 mg) require addition of neuraxial adjuv...
A Comparison Study Quality of Anaesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery: Bupivacaine with Adjuvant Clonidine versus Bupivacaine with Adjuvant Midazolam
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most commonly used anesthesia for orthopedic surgery. Despite of using long acting local anesthetic like Bupivacaine, the duration of anesthesia is short. Therefore, various drug comb...