Comparative study of hyperbaric bupivacaine and pentazocine in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2019, Vol 9, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: The administration of opioids intrathecally as a sole anesthetic has proven to be effective in providing adequate surgical anesthesia without much hemodynamic instability. This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of intrathecal Pentazocine as a sole anesthetic drug in patients undergoing lower segment caesarean section. Study Design: It was a randomized control double blinded study conducted in 200 patients undergoing lower segment caesarean section. Methods: The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups of 100 patients in each group. Group A received 1.5 ml (45 mg) intrathecal Pentazocine and Group B received 1.5ml intrathecal 0.5% Bupivacaine heavy before surgery. Duration of surgery, onset of sensory, and motor blockade and their duration, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and time for first rescue analgesia were statistically analyzed. Results: Onset of sensory blockade (2.65±0.78 vs 3.67±1.01 minutes) and motor blockade (2.43±1.13 vs 3.10±1.09 minutes) was earlier in Group A. Group B produced highest level of sensory blockade (T4) in majority of patients. Duration of analgesia is prolonged with Group B (2.46 ±0.496 vs 5.45±1.78 hours). Degree of motor blockade was better in group A, how ever duration of motor blockade was similar in both the groups. Group B patients were hemodynamically more stable intraoperatively and post operatively than Group A. Conclusion: Because of adequate surgical anesthesia, intraoperative hemodynamic stability and prolonged post-operative analgesia, we recommend the use of intrathecal Pentazocine as a sole anesthetic agent for lower segment caesarean sections.

Authors and Affiliations

Selvakumaran P, Anand B, Thirumaaran U G

Keywords

Related Articles

Effect of preanesthetic medication Clonidine vs gabapentin on hemodynamic responses following laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation:A comparative study

Objective: Comparing the effect of Clonidine and Gabapentin as premedication in attenuating hemodynamic responses following laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation was primary objective. Methods: In this randomized, prospec...

Comparative study on pre-operative ondansetron versus metoclopramide for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting

Post-operative nausea and vomiting are common complications. The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of pre-operative ondansetron versus Metoclopramide for its prevention. It was found that the incidence...

Attenuation of hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation: Comparison of clonidine, esmolol, lignocaine and placebo

Background: The laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation produce sympathoadrenal responses that alter in systemic arterial blood pressure, heart rate and cardiac rhythm. It leads to little consequences in healthy individ...

Comparative evaluation of the effect of intrathecal ketamine and fentanyl added to bupivacaine in elective hernia repair surgeries

Background: Addition of adjuvants in spinal anaesthesia spares the local anaesthetic dose and produces good postoperative analgesia. Aim: To compare the duration of prolongation of postoperative analgesia between Ketamin...

Comparison of intrathecal clonidine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine for hemodynamic response and postoperative analgesia in infraumbilical surgeries

Background: Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine is commonly used adjuncts with hyperbaric Bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia. Both are α2 adrenergic agoinsts. Dexmedetomidine is comparatively newer drug with lesser side effects...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP521046
  • DOI 10.26611/10159211
  • Views 187
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Selvakumaran P, Anand B, Thirumaaran U G (2019). Comparative study of hyperbaric bupivacaine and pentazocine in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 9(2), 37-41. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-521046